Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog

Georgia injury lawyers know that many times automobile accidents and tractor trailer truck accidents result from defects in either the design of a roadway or the existing dangerous condition of a roadway. This is particularly true if the roadway is under construction. Last week in Georgia, it was reported that a woman driving southbound on Interstate I-85 near Newnan, Georgia got a wheel off the edge of the pavement resulting in her losing control of her vehicle, crossing the highway median and hitting a tractor-trailer rig head-on. Sadly, the accident resulted in the woman’s death. Depending on the facts, the Georgia Dept of Transportation can be held liable for highway defects which cause injury of death.

The LA Times recently reported that a jury has ruled that the California Department of Transportation was partially negligent in a crash that killed two teenagers. According to the lawsuit, the agency knew that the rolling mountain road was unsafe prior to the accident. The jury agreed and awarded $6.3 million in damages to the families of those killed and a survivor injured in the accident.

The Georgia Injury Lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have over 40 years of experience pursuing wrongful death lawsuits, some of which have involved highway and road defects. If you have lost a loved one and feel you have a wrongful death claim, call our experienced attorneys at 1-800-228-9159 for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Bus Accidents , Highway & Road Defects , Motorcycle Accidents , Torts , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have written before about the potential liability one may have for ATV accidents, especially if it involves riding passengers. Not only does the owner of the ATV risk being sued for injuries or death caused by their use of the ATV, but they may also find that there is no liability coverage available to them when they are sued. Last week, the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of summary judgment to Allstate Insurance Company in its suit seeking a declaration from the Court that it had no duty to provide coverage, a defense or indemnification arising out of an accident, in which a young girl was thrown off the back of an ATV whose owners had a homeowners policy through Allstate. The court held that the accident in question fell under the policy’s exclusion for bodily injury arising our of the ownership or use of a motor vehicle, which is designated principally for recreational use off public roads when an insured person owns that vehicle and it is being used away from an insured premises. The accident here occurred at a field located approximately 15 miles from the insured’s home. Accordingly, although from a liability standpoint, there may be a number of viable claims that can be made against the owners of ATVs for their negligent operation of the ATV, there is often no insurance coverage available to compensate injured victims. If you or a loved one have been injured as a result of an ATV accident consult the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Premises Liability , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Over the years, our lawyers have handled many different cases involving serious injuries to children. These injuries arise in a myriad of contexts and are oftentimes heartbreaking. Over the years, we have had serious burn injury cases, dog bite cases,unsafe premises, sexual abuse cases, car accidents, medical malpractice cases, drowning accidents, playground injuries,unsafe consumer products, school injuries and the like, all involving young children. Some of these cases have resulted in wrongful deaths, comas, paralysis, burns and amputations. Presently, we are handling injuries to children involving negligence by daycare providers and owners of dogs who have allowed them to wander free of restraint and attack innocent children. Depending upon the severity of injuries sustained, these cases can affect the injured child permanently and the emotional, physical and psychic trauma can require very close attention to the needs of the young child. There may be permanent scarring involved; there may be the need for future treatment or medical surgery and there may be a diminution in the individual’s ability to earn and labor in the future and support themselves. While every case is unique, representing an injured child in a serious injury case is an undertaking that requires care and attention and an analysis of whether the injuries sustained will affect the child for the balance of their life. If so, obviously, greater attention to detail is needed than would otherwise be the case.

All cases involving children which result in a settlement or verdict have to be reviewed by the Probate Court system here in Georgia. The money from a settlement belongs to the child, not to the parents. While the parents are entitled to be reimbursed for any medical and out of pocket expenses that they incur, any other portion of the settlement must be placed in an interest bearing account set up for the lifetime benefit of the child. Such a fund must be held in trust until the child turns 18 but can be used for educational, medical or other needs of the child before they turn 18, however, such use is subject to Probate Court approval and supervision. Many Probate Courts take the position that the parents have to provide for the child until they reach the age of majority and therefore many courts will not allow parents to encroach upon any settlement funds as a way of discharging their own responsibilities. However, in certain cases, where the needs of the child are great, funds set aside for medical treatment and educational needs can be used, again subject to Probate Court supervision and approval.

When a child playing in the street darts in front of a car chasing a ball, and is seriously injured, the question arises, of course, whether there is any negligence claim at all against a third party. Many times children are killed or injured because of a lack of proper supervision by their parents and/or because of the child’s own negligence. Oftentimes, however, serious injuries to children occur which are entirely preventable and are caused by the negligence of third parties. We see this in the context of dog bite cases, automobile wrecks, daycare injuries, drowning accidents and the otherother similar cases referenced. Regardless of the circumstances involved which lead to the injury, care must be taken to make sure that the child that is properly represented and that the child’s needs are met. Our experienced serious injury lawyers share the common goal of properly representing injured children and assisting their families in obtaining the justice and compensation they require. If your child has been injured as a result of preventable accident caused by the negligence of a third party, call us today at 1-800-228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Physical and Sexual Assault , Premises Liability , Products Liability , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

When I was in high school, I was hired as a forklift driver at a textile plant. I was given no training whatsoever, had never operated a forklift and within hours was lifting huge pallets of heavy materials high into the air for placement on warehouse shelving. Fortunately, I did not injury anyone or kill myself, but I easily could have. Indeed, that same summer a high school friend of mine lost his life when he accidently drove a forklift backwards off of a loading ramp, killing himself in the process.

Just a month or two ago, here in Atlanta, I read about a news story where one employee at a car dealership was training another employee on how to drive a forklift when the co-worker overran the employee killing him. Here at Finch McCranie, we have represented individuals who were involved in industrial accidents where they were struck by forklifts inside of manufacturing facilities. These cases typically result in very serious personal injuries involving amputations, paralysis or death. Incredibility, my experience in high school is repeated over and over again as oftentimes the operator of these forklifts has been provided little or no training. Today, this is a violation of OSHA regulations. It was not in the 70's and 80's.

Forklifts are very heavy and very dangerous industrial vehicles involved every year in a large number of deaths and serious injuries in the workplace. Many of the injuries and fatalities committed while these vehicles are being operated could have been prevented if the operators had been properly trained and/or had properly protected themselves. Oftentimes, the operators of these vehicles are not wearing seatbelts and/or seatbelts are not even provided for their use. If such a vehicle overturns, because of its weight, the operator can be crushed.

Because many of these industrial accidents are preventable, proper training standards should include specified training, seatbelts, overhead protective devices, alarms and proper maintenance of these forklift trucks. If these dangerous vehicles are not properly maintained and/or the operator is not properly trained, serious accidents are foreseeable.

One reason the public may not be as aware of these types of accidents is because they are typically covered by workers’ compensation where lawsuits are not involved. If one employee injuries a co-employee, the claim is covered by workers’ compensation laws not by liability statutes. However, our firm has been involved in cases where a forklift driver injured a third party, not a co-employee, such as a truck driver or another person present on a plant’s premises when the forklift was being operated. In such cases, litigation oftentimes ensues, again, because the injuries are very serious and the victim typically is permanently disabled and unable to work again. Lawsuits can be a determent to other claims but this provides little comfort for the victim, as we have seen in the past.

If one goes on any search engine one will find the term “forklift accidents” to be somewhat ubiquitous. This is proof in and of itself that these heavy industrial machines are capable of inflicting serious injury and wrongful death if not properly operated. Regrettably, based on the number of these industrial accidents each year, we anticipate that third parties will continue to be injured by these dangerous instrumentalities at an ever increasing pace until and unless there is a greater state or federal penalty for failing to properly train the operators of these machines. OSHA penalties are typically small. Therefore, the biggest financial penalty that can be imposed as a determent may be a lawsuit and jury verdict.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Torts , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As a Georgia injury lawyer, I read almost everyday about a death or serious personal injuries sustained as a result of an All Terrain Vehicle ATV accident. With the increasing popularity of ATVs it is inevitable that there will be more accidents and injuries; however, most are preventable. Without exception, most ATV accidents can be traced back to a rider who broke at least one of the ATV Safety Institute’s Golden Rules. Whether you’re riding in a public park or on private land, keep these eight guidelines in mind:

Always wear a helmet and other protective gear.

Never ride on public roads — another vehicle could hit you.

Never ride under the influence of alcohol or other drugs.

Never carry a passenger on a single-rider ATV.

Ride an ATV that’s right for your age.

Supervise riders younger than 16; ATVs are not toys or baby-sitters.

Ride only on designated trails and at a safe speed.

Take an ATV RiderCourse; visit www.atvsafety.org or call (800) 887-2887.

In my experience, one of the most violated guidelines involves riding passengers. Over and over I read about children riding other children on the back of a single rider ATV. This is extremely dangerous and it is a parent’s responsibility to make sure that it does not occur. A parent who provides an ATV to a child and fails to supervise the child’s operation of it can be held liable in damages for the death of another person who is injured or killed in an accident. If you or a loved one have been seriously injured by someone negligently operating an ATV, call one of the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Brain Injury , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Georgia injury lawyers, handling a claim for a catastrophically injured employee or the family of a deceased employee, our investigation will often reveal that the employee received injuries while working on or around a piece of machinery that caused the death, some traumatic amputation or other trauma to the employee. In such a case, the attorney must consider potential product liability claims, such as defective design, manufacture, assembly, testing or failure to warn or misrepresentation. The Supreme Court of Georgia has outlined the test for whether a product is defective in terms of risk-utility analysis. There are three (3) principal basis of recovery in product liability actions: Negligence; Breach of Warranty; and Strict Liability.

Like any other claim, actions for damages based on product liability are governed by statutes of limitations. For personal injury actions based on negligence or strict liability related to product liability, a two year statute of limitations applies. However, there is an additional limitation that an attorney representing an employee injured by a product of any kind must consider as soon as he is retained. This is the statute of repose and it functions in addition to the statute of limitations. This statute of repose is a complete band to strict liability and negligence actions filed more than ten (10) years after the date of the first sale or use or consumption of the products, regardless of when the injury occurred. Thus, an injured employee’s time to file a case could be much less than two years. The statute of repose does not apply to claims based on failure of the manufacturer to warn of product related damage.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured on-the-job, call the Georgia workers compensation lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Products Liability , Torts , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Georgia and South Carolina injury lawyers are seeing ATV accidents involving serious injury and sometimes death are on the rise with the return of warm weather. Tragically many, if not most are preventable by using common sense and obeying ATV rules. Just this week, I read about a Summerville, South Carolina teenager who is fighting for her life as a result of being thrown from the back of a fast moving ATV. According to witnesses, neither the 32 year old ATV driver or the teenage passenger were wearing helmuts.

Almost all ATV fatalities or serious injuries occur while violating one or more of the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s “Rules of ATV Operation”. Those rules are as follows:

1. Children under sixteen (16) should not ride adult-sized ATV (engines bigger than 90 cc’s).
2. Take a hands-on safety course.
3. Always wear a helmet while on an ATV.
4. Never drive an ATV on paved roads.
5. Never drive while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
6. Never drive an ATV with a passenger, and never ride as a passenger.

Despite these common sense rules, we continue to see children operating ATV’s and worse yet, operating them with passengers. Every new ATV that has come from the factory in recent years has a decal that warns the driver not to ride passengers. As demonstrated by the tragic accident involving the South Carolina teen, serious injuries can result from riding as a passenger on the back of an ATV. Adults who operate an ATV in violation of the rules potentially subject themselves to civil liability for their negligence, if someone is seriously injured or killed as a result of their negligence. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured on an ATV, call the ATV injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP at 1 (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Brain Injury , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our Atlanta based lawyers are constantly involved in cases involving brain injury and brain death. As tragic as these cases are, the families and loved ones are many times faced with the decision whether to cease life support after there has been a medical determination of brain death.

In general, brain death is considered to be the irreversible loss of brain function. The exact definition has changed throughout the years and is still subject to debate. The brainstem controls brain function and is responsible for regulating breathing, heart rate, reflexes, withdrawal from pain. Thus, diagnosing brain death requires the absence of brainstem function.

Most states have adopted a version of the Uniform Determination of Death Act thereby establishing a definition of brain death. The Uniform Act defines brain death as follows:
Determination of Death. An individual who has sustained either (1) irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions, or (2) irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem, is dead. A determination of death must be made in accordance with accepted medical standards.

The Georgia legislature has enacted O.C.G.A. §31-10-16 which defines brain death as folows:
(a) A person may be pronounced dead by a qualified physician, or by a registered professional nurse authorized to make a pronouncement of death under Code Section 31-7-176.1, if it is determined that the individual has sustained either (1) irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory function, or (2) irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem. (b) A person who acts in good faith in accordance with the provisions of subsection (a) of this Code section shall not be liable for damages in any civil action or subject to prosecution in any criminal proceeding for such act. (c) The criteria for determining death authorized in subsection (a) of this Code section shall be cumulative to and shall not prohibit the use of other medically recognized criteria for determining death

Brain death is usually determined in the Intensive Care Unit of a hospital or in the Emergency Department. The determination usually involves three steps. First, unconsciousness is verified. To do this, a Glasgow score of 3 is required. The Glasgow scale is neurological scale which aims to give a reliable, objective way of recording the conscious state of a person, for initial as well as continuing assessment. Secondly, the patient is clinically checked for brainstem reflexes. If all brainstem reflexes are absent the third and last step is taken. This is the performing of an apnea test. Apnea is the cessation of breathing. This test is to ensure that the patient has no drive to breathe and confirms brain death.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have previously posted on the danger posed by defective grinding wheels that explode or disintegrate. When a grinding wheel comes apart, it can result in serious eye injury and even death. Although there are several reasons why these wheels fail, it is thought that many of these are inferior, imported products.

To prevent injuries, the following procedures are recommended when using grinding wheels:

* Check the wheel before each use for any cracks or chips. If any are found, discard
and replace with a new wheel.

* Perform a ring test. Wipe the wheel clean. Hold the wheel through the center hole with one finger. Using the plastic end (not rubber coated) of a screwdriver, tap the wheel on side. If it gives a metallic ring, the wheel is fine. If it is cracked, it will give a dull ring, or no ring at all.

* Always adjust the tool rest to sit no more than one-eighth (1/8) of an inch from the wheel. If it cannot be adjusted to sit at that width, the wheel is probably worn and should be replaced.

* Follow manufacturer’s instructions on replacing a wheel.

* Make sure that the new grinding wheel is rated to operate at the maximum speed of the grinder. Do not surpass the maximum speed.

* When beginning grinding, do not grind on a “cold” wheel. Apply the work gradually to “warm up” the wheel.

* Always wear the proper personal protective equipment: safety glasses/face shield, gloves, aprons.

* Use the guard at all times, no matter how small the job. Never alter or remove the guard.

* Before using a new wheel, turn it on, stand to the side, and watch for any abnormalities. It is recommended that a user allow the grinder to run for a minute before beginning to grind.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured as a result of a grinding wheel failure, it is critically important to preserve whatever evidence is available. Accordingly, not only should the tool itself be preserved for inspection but also all of the fragments of the grinding wheel should be collected and kept so that they can be analyzed by an expert. As always, the product liability lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP stand ready to consult with you about dangerous products.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Products Liability , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Recently an Atlanta eye surgeon told one of the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP that his group sees at least two new patients a month with serious eye injuries caused by grinding wheel accidents. Often times , the hazards of using a grinding wheel are overlooked. When using a grinder there are several potential hazards to of which you should be aware. They include: cuts and amputations; eye injuries from flying particles; punctures from work piece or debris; hearing loss from noise; and inhalation of toxic materials, including dust and silica.

Exploding grinding wheels pose a very serious risk to users. For instance, the United States Department of Labor published “A Partial List of Accidents Involving Grinders” for the period of 1990 through 1997. Out of 27 accidents, 7 of them resulted in death as a result of the victim being struck by pieces of a disintegrating grinding wheel.

In terms of grind wheel safety, there are several things to keep in mind.

* Grinding wheels have a shelf life and you should use grinding wheels within two (2) years of their manufacture date.

* Improper mounting of the wheel to the tool can cause the wheel to break.

* Using a wheel at a speed greater than that for which it was designed can lead to failure.

* Personal Protection Equipment should ALWAYS be used when using a grinder.

It is thought that one reason for the number of grinding wheel failures may be that many of them may now involve imported and inferior wheels. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured as a result of an exploding or disintegrating grinding wheel it is critically important to preserve as much of the evidence as possible, including the tool itself and the wheel fragments. The product liability lawyers at at Finch McCranie, LLP will be happy to consult with you about the case.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Many Georgia parents employ child safety seats to protect the lives of their children without any reliable data as to the safety of the particular seat model. Now, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has announced that he will urge carmakers to crash-test child safety seats in their vehicles and recommend which child restraints are the safest in each auto.

If adopted, this new system would be a victory for parents who struggle to find the best car seats for their children. While federal regulators rate new cars for safety, they have no such system for child car seats. Making matters more difficult, a child restraint that performs well in one vehicle may perform poorly in another because it doesn't fit snugly in that back seat.

Secretary LaHood’s action comes after the Chicago Tribune revealed that nearly half of all infant restraints failed catastrophically or exceeded injury limits when federal contractors strapped them into the back seats of model-2008 vehicles and crashed those cars and trucks into walls at 35 m.p.h.. NHTSA used those tests to rate the safety of the cars, not the child restraints in them.

At LaHood's insistence, the NHTSA child seat crash-test results -- including reports, video and photos -- are posted online.

European regulators require automakers to include child seats in their crash tests of new cars. The safety rating for those European vehicles is based in part on how they protect children. LaHood held up the European system as a model.

LaHood said he would push for a voluntary system. The secretary said he also ordered NHTSA to institute stringent safety standards for child seats in side-impact crashes, which account for one third of infant highway deaths.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Products Liability

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have represented many victims of traumatic brain injury resulting from serious automobile accidents, tractor trailer accidents, workers compensation accidents, ATV/All Terrain Vehicle accidents, motorcycle accidents and premises liability accidents. A traumatic brain injury (TBI) is caused by a blow or jolt to the head or a penetrating head injury that disrupts the normal function of the brain. Not all blows or jolts to the head result in a TBI. The severity of a TBI may range from “mild,” i.e., a brief change in mental status or consciousness to “severe,” i.e., an extended period of unconsciousness or amnesia after the injury.

What many people do not realize is that major depression is a complication seen in about one-third of patients within the first year of a TBI and when present, is associated with poor psychosocial functioning and persisting post-concussive symptoms. Major depression is associated with substantial psychosocial dysfunction and post-concussive symptomatology following traumatic brain injury. Medication has been and is still prescribed to treat this complication; however, in a recent large clinical sample of patients with symptoms of major depression, anti-depressant medication has been shown to lead to the remission of symptoms in a minority of patients.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Premises Liability , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our Atlanta lawyers see many cases involving serious head injuries which at first appear to be minor or nonexistent. The recent report about actress Natasha Richardson who fell at a Canadian ski slope is a prime example. According to reports, Ms. Richardson, suffered a minor fall while skiing.

According to reports, she was talking and joking after she fell Monday. But soon after she returned to her hotel room she complained of head pain and was taken to a nearby hospital, then to a larger medical center in Montreal. She was later flown by private jet to a New York hospital, where she is reportedly in critical condition.

A blow to the head that at first seems minor and does not result in immediate pain or other symptoms can in fact turn out to be a life-threatening brain injury. Immediate treatment is essential after a brain injury because damage caused by swelling is often irreversible.

The initial fall or injury doesn't have to be hard at all. The delay in symptoms can range from five minutes to three hours after the accident.

Experts report that a patient can appear deceivingly normal at first, but they may actually have a brain bleed and as the pressure builds up, they experience classic symptoms of a traumatic brain injury. This condition is commonly referred to as "talk and die" syndrome, because the patient can decline so rapidly.

These injuries are known as epidural hemorrhages. Blood gets trapped between the skull and the dura which is a hard layer of skin between the bone and brain. As the blood flows from the ruptured artery, the fluid builds and can puncture the dura.

The pressure is pushed on the brain, causing it to swell. Since the brain is restricted by the skull, there is often no room for it to move inside the skull cavity.

Nausea, severe headache, glossy eyes, sudden sleepiness, are all common symptoms of a brain injury. Getting to a hospital within the first few hours is critical to prevent permanent brain damage. Immediate treatment is essential after a brain injury because the initial damage caused by swelling often is irreversible.

Experts warn that the most important thing to do to lower your risk of a brain injury is to wear a helmet.

Continue reading "Minor Falls Can Lead To Severe Brain Injury" »

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury

Bookmark:

Georgia injury lawyers who have handled automobile accidents, trucking accidents, and even workers compensation cases, where a person has suffered a serious injury to the head, often hear their clients complain about the same symptoms. We recently represented a women whose automobile was rear-ended by another vehicle. Upon impact, her head slammed into the headrest of the seat. Although she did not immediately experience visual problems, she began to experience double vision within a day of the collision. Experience demonstrates and the medical literature documents that a person who has suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI) or cerebral vascular accident (CVA) may often experience difficulties with balance, spacial orientation, coordination, cognitive function, and speech. In most cases, a referral for visual consultation only occurs if there is an injury to an eye or if ocular pathology is suspected. Persons with TBI or CVA frequently will experience double vision, movement of print or stationary objects such as walls and floors, eye strain, visual fatigue, headaches and problems with balance, to name several. Frequently, people will report problems with their vision to rehabilitation professionals and be referred for eye examination. Unfortunately, many will be told that there is nothing wrong with their eyes and that it is the effects of their TBI or CVA. Others will be told that their symptoms are not related to their vision. Visual problems are among the most common sequella following a TBI or CVA, but frequently not dealt with I a timely manner. If you or a loved one have been involved in an accident of any type involving trauma to the head, you should be aware of the many symptoms that might indicate a TBI. The injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP are experienced at handling TBI cases. If you have been injured as a result of the negligence of someone, please call us at (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Workers Compensation

Bookmark:

Georgia injury lawyers who have handled automobile accidents, trucking accidents, and even workers compensation cases, where a person has suffered a serious injury to the head, often hear their clients complain about the same symptoms. We recently represented a women whose automobile was rear-ended by another vehicle. Upon impact, her head slammed into the headrest of the seat. Although she did not immediately experience visual problems, she began to experience double vision within a day of the collision. Experience demonstrates and the medical literature documents that a person who has suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI) or cerebral vascular accident (CVA) may often experience difficulties with balance, spacial orientation, coordination, cognitive function, and speech. In most cases, a referral for visual consultation only occurs if there is an injury to an eye or if ocular pathology is suspected. Persons with TBI or CVA frequently will experience double vision, movement of print or stationary objects such as walls and floors, eye strain, visual fatigue, headaches and problems with balance, to name several. Frequently, people will report problems with their vision to rehabilitation professionals and be referred for eye examination. Unfortunately, many will be told that there is nothing wrong with their eyes and that it is the effects of their TBI or CVA. Others will be told that their symptoms are not related to their vision. Visual problems are among the most common sequella following a TBI or CVA, but frequently not dealt with I a timely manner. If you or a loved one have been involved in an accident of any type involving trauma to the head, you should be aware of the many symptoms that might indicate a TBI. The injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP are experienced at handling TBI cases. If you have been injured as a result of the negligence of someone, please call us at (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Workers Compensation

Bookmark:

We have posted entries before about traumatic amputations and just how profound such injuries can be on the victims of the same. Unfortunately, we have seen these injuries too often in the context of motorcycle accidents. Because there is so little protection to the human body, if an accident is bad enough, the unfortunate victim riding on the motorcycle can lose a leg, an arm, a foot or a hand. In addition to traumatic amputations, traumatic brain injuries are also a distinct possibility in such cases. We have seen many such cases even when the motorcycle rider (or passenger) was wearing a helmet. If the blow is hard enough and the victim is thrown from his motorcycle and lands on the pavement, even with a good helmet, one can sustain either a closed head injury or a fractured skull. We have also handled cases where a broken neck resulted in death and/or paralysis. Again, when a motorcycle rider is involved in a serious collision, it is almost to be expected that there will be serious injuries involved.

The most dangerous aspect of riding a motorcycle is not the driver of the motorcycle but the third party driver who does not see the motorcycle and pulls out in front of it. Drivers are accustomed to seeing other cars and for whatever reason, many times pull out in front of motorcycles and fail to yield right-of-way to them. This can cause a serious collision between the motorcycle and vehicle resulting in a serious injury to the motorcycle rider. Traumatic amputations, traumatic brain injuries and associated orthopaedic injuries are what we typically see, which obviously indicates that motorcycle riders must be extremely cautious at all times when operating their bikes. This is particularly true in an urban area such as Atlanta where there are so many vehicles on the road. As accidents can happen in a split second and as such accidents are always serious for the motorcycle rider, wearing a helmet is absolutely mandatory from a safety standpoint but, of course, a helmet provides little protection from injuries to one’s limbs.

If you or a loved one are involved in a serious accident while riding a motorcycle, you should consult with counsel who has experience handling such cases. Typically the injuries are serious and thus qualified and experienced counsel is needed to assess the physical, emotional and vocational needs that arise from these types of cases. In addition, if liability is contested, an accident reconstruction expert may be needed to evaluate the claim. If the injuries are likely to be permanent, a Life Care expert may be necessary if something as serious as paralysis or traumatic brain injury or amputation is involved. In short, these are serious cases that involve extremely serious matters which require that qualified and competent counsel with experience in such cases be retained if the innocent victim’s interests are to be properly protected.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents

Bookmark:

The Georgia Injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have seen many automobile accidents and tractor trailer accidents which have left victims with a diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Some clients have suffered from major, catastrophic brain injury while others have what would be considered as mild TBI. The signs and symptoms of a TBI can be subtle. Symptoms of a TBI may not appear until days or weeks following the injury or may even be missed as people may look fine even thought they may act or feel differently. The following are some common signs and symptoms of a TBI:

Headache or neck pain that do not go away;
Difficulty remembering, concentrating, or making decisions;
Slowness in thinking, speaking, acting, or reading;
Getting lost or easily confused;
Feeling tired all of the time, having no energy or motivation;
Mood changes (feeling sad or angry for no reason);
Changes in sleep patterns (sleeping a lot more or having a hard time sleeping); Lightheadedness, dizziness, or loss of balance;
Urge to vomit (nausea);
Increased sensitivity to lights, sounds, or distractions;
Blurred vision or eyes that tire easily;
Loss of sense of smell or taste; and
Ringing in the ears.

If you or a loved one have been involved in an accident of any type involving trauma to the head, you should be aware of the many symptoms that might indicate a TBI. The injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP are experienced at handling TBI cases. If you have been injured as a result of the negligence of someone, please call us at (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Workers Compensation

Bookmark:

Every year the Georgia injury attorneys at Finch McCranie, LLP get calls about people being seriously injured on All Terrain Vehicles (ATVs), especially children. Just last year we had a wrongful death case involving a minor and an ATV. In that case, we represented the family of a young girl who was thrown off of the back of an ATV while riding as a passenger, at night and with no helmet! As spring approaches, a quick warning about the dangers of ATVs is in order. When used appropriately and with proper safety precautions, ATVs can be an enjoyable form of recreation. However, when used inappropriately, these vehicles pose a great risk for catastrophic injury, including TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury). Consumer critics argue more limitations must be placed on ATV use. Backing then are some staggering numbers. For instance, children under the age of 16 account for two-thirds (2/3) of ATV-related deaths and injuries. Some states have passed regulations prohibiting young children from riding and requiring riders to wear helmets. One state (North Carolina) now requires safety training for all ATV riders. Unfortunately Georgia has no age restrictions and no helmet law. Regardless of what the lawmakers say, parents must insure their children are safely using ATVs, in order to avoid serious injuries or death. In our recent case, neither the driver of the ATV or the passenger were being properly supervised by adults. As a result of negligent supervision, she died. If you or a loved one have been injured on an ATV either as a result of a product defect of the ATV or because of the negligence of someone operating one, call the experienced lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP at (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Brain Injury , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Recently, we had a client whose vehicle was rear-ended at a high rate of speed. She immediately began to experience visual problem, including double vision which lasted for about two weeks. Many people involved in a serious automobile accident experience the same symptoms which is a classic sign of a traumatic brain injury. A person who has suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI) may often experience difficulties with balance, spacial orientation, coordination, cognitive function, and speech. In most cases, a referral for visual consultation only occurs if there is an injury to an eye or if ocular pathology is suspected. Persons with TBI frequently will experience double vision, movement of print or stationary objects such as walls and floors, eye strain, visual fatigue, headaches and problems with balance, to name several. Frequently, people will report problems with their vision to rehabilitation professionals and be referred for eye examination. Unfortunately, many will be told that there is nothing wrong with their eyes and that it is the effects of their TBI. Others will be told that their symptoms are not related to their vision. Visual problems are among the most common sequella following a traumatic brain injury and should not be ignored. Competent medical providers and rehabilitation specialists should immediately recognize the significance of post trauma visual problems and treat their patients in conformity with new TBI treatment guidelines. If you or a loved one has sustained a traumatic brain injury as a result of an automobile or trucking accident, call the professional Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents

Bookmark:

Not a month goes by that the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP don’t run into serious automobile accident or tractor trailer accident cases where our client has sustained a traumatic brain injury to some degree. These can occur from all types of accidents, including workers compensation accidents, ATV/All Terrain Vehicle accidents, motorcycle accidents and premises liability accidents.

A traumatic brain injury (TBI) is caused by a blow or jolt to the head or a penetrating head injury that disrupts the normal function of the brain. Not all blows or jolts to the head result in a TBI. The severity of a TBI may range from “mild,” i.e., a brief change in mental status or consciousness to “severe,” i.e., an extended period of unconsciousness or amnesia after the injury. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), TBIs contribute to a substantial number of deaths and cases of permanent disability annually. Of the 1.4 million people who sustain a TBI each year in the United States, 50,000 die; 235,000 are hospitalized; and 1.1 million are treated and released from an emergency department. Among children, ages 0 to 14 years, TBI results in an estimated 2,685 deaths; 37,000 hospitalizations; and 435,000 emergency department visits annually. The number of people with TBI who are not seen in an emergency department or who receive no care is unknown. Interestingly, the two leading causes of TBI are falls (28%) and motor vehicle crashes (20%).

If you or a loved one has sustained a severe head injury in an accident, contact the experienced lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP. (800) 228-9159

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Premises Liability , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Workers Compensation

Bookmark:

As Georgia injury lawyers we, at Finch McCranie, LLP, often see victims of automobile accidents and trucking accidents who sustain trauma to the head. The care they get in the minutes and hours following can be crucial to their recovery. Often important signs of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) are overlooked. Recently the American College of Emergency Physicians in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revised the clinical guidelines for mild brain injuries. Those new guidelines are expected to lead to better patient outcomes for the more than one million patients who visit the emergency department every year for traumatic brain injury or concussion. It is well know by qualified medical professionals that people with traumatic brain injuries may appear to be normal and their symptoms may be mild but there can be hidden dangers. TBI’s can also lead to significant, life-long impairments that prevent a person’s ability to function both physically and mentally. The revised guidelines are designed to help insure that patients even with mild TBI’s are identified early and receive the care they need.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents

Bookmark:

Every spring and summer as swimming pools open for the season, we read about tragic drownings, often involving children. Statistics show that drowning and near drowning are a leading cause of death and brain injury. Many of these unfortunate incidents could be prevented if swimming pools had proper anti-drowning drain covers and suction cutoff devices installed. These covers and suction cutoff devices are designed to prevent children from being caught in the swimming pool drain as a result of strong suction. Under the new federal regulation, which went into effect last year, public swimming pools and hot tubs are required to install special devices that will prevent drain suction from trapping children under water. These new rules apply to pools and spas used by the public, including municipal pools and those at hotels, private clubs, apartment buildings and community centers. The new law does not require retro-fitting of private home pools.
As with any case, it is always important to throughly investigate the facts of a tragedy in a timely manner so as to preserve evidence. The law firm of Finch McCranie, LLP has represented the families of victims of serious injury and wrongful death accidents for over 40 years.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Premises Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The injury lawyers in our firm have seen over the years that bicycle-car accidents can have serious consequences for the cyclist and often involve death or, at a minimum serious personal injury. A recent verdict demonstrates the kind of traumatic injuries that can occur in a bicycle-car collision. In that case, a jury returned a $1.8 million verdict in a personal injury case brought by a college student. She was seriously injured in 2005 when she was struck by 2 vehicles at an intersection near her campus. The injuries she sustained led to her having several surgeries and the partial amputation of her left leg.

The Finch McCranie, LLC firm in Atlanta, Georgia believes cyclists have the right to hold negligent drivers responsible for the harm they cause. If you have been hurt in a bike-car collision, you should contact a Georgia bike accident injury attorney at Finch McCranie, LLP. We have helped Georgia accident victims with the compensation they deserve since 1965, and we are committed to providing personalized service. For a free consultation, call us at 1-800-228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As Georgia personal injury lawyers we have represented many people who have died or sustained serious injuries as a result of falling. Many of them are senior citizens and many of the accidents are a result of dangerous conditions caused by the negligence of stores, restaurants and other businesses. Although the elderly most fear breaking a hip when they fall, a government study indicates that hitting their head can also have deadly consequences. Brain injuries account for half of all deaths from falls.
The study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the first comprehensive national look at the role brain injuries play in fatal elderly falls. It examined 16,000 deaths in 2005 that listed unintentional falls as an underlying cause of death. The study found that slightly more than half of the deaths were attributed to brain injuries. The other deaths were due to a variety of causes including heart failure, strokes, infections and existing chronic conditions worsened by a broken hip or other injuries sustained in a fall.

The attorneys at Finch McCranie, LLP have been standing up for the rights of injured victims for over 40 years. If you or a loved one has fallen and been injured as a result of the negligence of a store or other business, call us at (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Elder Abuse And Nursing Home Negligence , Premises Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our U.S. law firm celebrates Canada's Thanksgiving Day in October for a reason. When some Canadian citizens suffered tragic injuries and deaths in a tractor-trailer accident in Georgia some years ago, a Canadian lawyer contacted me to represent his parents, who had lost a son in this horrific truck wreck.

That role of helping Canadian families with their legal needs grew, as another Canadian family (through their Canadian lawyer) contacted me for the same reason.

I spent a Canadian Thanksgiving visiting the surviving parents, siblings, nieces, nephews, and in-laws of one of the most delightful human beings whom I never had the pleasure of meeting, but whom I came to know through representing his family through this tragedy. Their "real" Thanksgiving was delayed until we successfully resolved their case.

Later, in visiting the homes of other Canadian clients, I developed more of these bittersweet relationships with very fine people who live north of our U.S. border. We are now lifelong friends.

Recently, in visiting with our Canadian consul and his wife in Atlanta (terrific people who are neighbors of ours), I recounted some of the stories of these wonderful families. He requested our firm's contact information and said he was glad to know that our law firm is available to help Canadian families dealing with personal injuries or deaths in the U.S.

We have a great appreciation for our clients from Canada, and look forward to helping other Canadian families.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Aviation Accidents , Brain Injury , Premises Liability , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The tragedy of preventable construction accidents was repeated last week at the Atlanta Botanical Garden, a beautiful area near my home enjoyed by young and old alike. News reports have described the horror of one dead, and eighteen injured, many of them critically.

In our experience from having handled contruction accidents--including a much larger structure's construction collapse during the building of Philips Arena that killed ironworkers erecting a section of precast concrete--the injured workers and their families are in a state of shock and confusion. They should have some medical care available through their workers' compensation carrier, but that will not be enough to make up for what sound like very significant injuries. Nor will those benefits be enough to compensate the losses of the deceased worker.

A careful analysis must follow to determine the identity of all of the parties who had any role in the project, as well as the scope of the work undertaken by each of them, and the legal responsibilities imposed by contract or by law.

The plans and specifications prepared by the design professionals (architects and engineers), and the contracts and various subcontracts on the project must be obtained and scrutinized. Not only the contractor and subcontractors, but also any inspectors and consultants involved will have their roles reviewed, to determine what went wrong.

While some parties will have immunity under the workers' compensation statute, others will not. Those who share responsibility presumably will have purchased insurance in planning for precisely this type of catastrophe, so that the losses can be reimbursed fairly. With so many claimants, however, careful review of the insurance coverage will be necessary in case there was insufficient liability insurance purchased to cover these tragic losses.

In the Philips Arena cases, the parties involved resolved the claims in the largest mediation ever held at Henning Mediation in Atlanta--48 people who spent many days, including with Judge Jerry Baxter, who was instrumental in helping get the cases resolved. The families were distressed by their losses, but felt that the legal system had treated them fairly.

Unfortunately, in our experience the families may be beset by unscrupulous persons hoping to take advantage of their shock--and some may be attorneys without the type of experience needed to represent these victims fully and fairly. We hope that the families of those injured consult with family and friends to find experienced attorneys who have had success in this area, and who will leave no stone unturned in representing their clients.

Footnote: According to news reports, architecture firm Jova/Daniels/Busby made this statement this morning:

"During the construction process, there are temporary components built and used to help erect and support the creation of a permanent structure such as the walkway being built at the Atlanta Botanical Garden. While the investigation underway will help us all understand what actually occurred, it is important for people to know that the permanent structure as designed by the architect and the engineers was not fully in place at the time of the accident.

"The temporary components that are under investigation were designed by a separate professional engineer working for the structural steel erectors. The temporary shoring would have been removed after the permanent structure was complete."

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

A construction collapse involving a bridge was reported this morning at the Atlanta Botanical Gardens. Unfortunately, there appears to be one death and many serious injuries. Our lawyers have investigated and filed lawsuits in numerous construction collapse cases. The most notable was the collapse during the building of Phillips Arena in Atlanta.

While the reports do not indicate the cause of the collapse, there will undoubtedly be an investigation by OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Many times attorneys mistakingly believe that any recovery in these cases is barred by the workers compensation statute. In essence this statute prohibits an employee for suing an employer or co-employee for negligence.

However, there are many potential avenues by which a recovery for these types of fatalities and serious injuries can be obtained. There is potential liability against the designers and architects for improper or dangerous design. There may also be liability for the negligent installation or work of others who are not deemed co-employees. We have also successfully established liabilty for the furnishing or selling of defective components such as poorly mixed concrete.

Construction injuries resulting from collapses or failure of equipment should always be explored and investigated thoroughly. The failure to do so can result in a deserving client or survivor settling for small workers compensation benefits when a much larger recovery was probable.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

A Cobb County, Georgia policeman who was struck by another officer’s motorcycle has been awarded $750, 000 by a Fulton County Superior Court jury for head injuries that only emerged several months after the motorcycle accident. The winning patrolman was among several motorcycle officers from various agencies who were riding in “tight formation” in August 2005,when a MARTA officer hit him from behind. Apparently the plaintiff almost immediately returned to work following the accident; however, he began to have seizures approximately six months after the accident. A neurologist testified that the seizures had resulted from head injuries suffered in the accident which would require him to take anti-seizure medication. Following the four-day trial, the jury took about two hours before bringing back a verdict in favor of the patrolman.

If you have been injured as a result of a motorcycle accident, the trial lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have the experience in these cases to fully protect your rights.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents

Bookmark:

Last month there was a meeting in Atlanta of The Association of Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America and The Georgia Trial Lawyers Association. One of our trucking injury attorneys attended that meeting where there was a presentation on Traumatic Brain Injury. Our law firm has handled many cases involving brain injury that resulted from either a tractor trailer truck accident or automobile accident.

Because many brain injuries occur as a result of tractor-trailer accidents and are frequently overlooked, because lawyers are concentrating on the obvious orthopaedic injuries sustained in those accidents, one of the presentations was devoted to educating attorneys on some of the signs and symptoms of brain injury and concussions. It is important to understand that many symptoms following a concussion are not immediately evident and may take days or weeks to become apparent. Accordingly, many times there is a need to have a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment to assess and document the long term consequences of this invisible injury.

Each year over 5,000 men, women and children are killed on America’s highways as a result of a crash with a big truck? Far too often these truck wrecks were caused by the violation of government safety laws which are designed to regulate tractor trailers and other interstate trucks. These regulations govern truck speed, truck safety devices, proper truck maintainece, truck driver training, the number of hours the truck drivers can remain behind the wheel and proper back ground checks by the trucking company on their drivers both before being hired and thereafter on a periodic basis.

The law firm of Finch McCranie, LLP is well versed in these trucking regulations and has experience in representing the victims of interstate truck accidents.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents

Bookmark:

In November of 2000, while ballots were being counted in Florida, I stood in the trauma unit of the Orlando Regional Medical Center with my daughter who had been assaulted. Over the month she was there, one helicopter after another landed on the roof of the trauma unit delivering victims of automobile accidents and motorcycle accidents with severe injuries. Many of them died and many of them sustained severe brain injuries. Many of those traumatic brain injuries occurred because the person riding the motorcycle had no helmet on at the time of the collision. Georgia has a mandatory helmet law requiring all people operating or riding motorcycles to wear helmets - no exceptions. Florida law does not require the use of helmets if you are at least 21 years old and “covered by an insurance policy providing for at least $10,000.00 in medical benefits for injuries incurred as a result of a crash while operating or riding on a motorcycle.” Four states still have no helmet law whatsoever, Illinois, Colorado, New Hampshire and Iowa. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta publishes statistics on traumatic brain injuries by state and the numbers, while high, are not surprising when comparing the two states. For example in 1998, the number of nonfatal TBI hospitalization cases in Georgia was 5,581. The number in Florida was 12719, more than twice that of Georgia!

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents

Bookmark:

In our Georgia injury practice our lawyers have seen many serious accidents, including automobile accidents and truck accidents, which result in brain injury of varying degrees. Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBI’s) contribute to a substantial number of deaths and cases of permanent disability annually. The Centers For Disease Control (CDC) estimates that at least 5.3 million Americans, about 2% of the U.S. population, currently have a long-term or lifelong need for help to perform activities of daily living as a result of a TBI.

The severity of a TBI may range from “mild”, i.e, a brief change in mental status or consciousness to “severe”, i.e., an extended period of unconsciousness or amnesia after the injury. Approximately 1.4 million people sustain a traumatic brain injury each year in the united States. Of those: 50,000 die; 235,000 are hospitalized; and 1.1 million are treated and released from an emergency department. Among children ages 0 to 14 years, TBI results in an estimated 2685 deaths; 37,000 hospitalizations; and 435,000 emergency room visits. The number of people with TBI who are not seen in an emergency room department or who receive no treatment are unknown.

Some of the statistics relating to traumatic brain injury are surprising. For example, males are about twice as likely as females to sustain a TBI. The two age groups at highest risk for TBI are 0 - 4 year olds and 15 -19 year olds. African Americans have the highest death rate from TBI.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury

Bookmark:

Over the years, we have noticed that client’s who have suffered a brain injury as a result of an automobile accident or truck accident often complain about feeling unusually fatigued or tired. An interesting study confirms that following a recovery from brain damage, patients may have to use more of there brains then they did before the brain trauma.

The study published in the September 9th issue of Neurology found that patients who sustained diffuse axonal injury and returned to pre-injury levels of functioning in either school or work requires more regions of their brains to perform tasks related to executive functioning and working memory.

These findings are significant because it may explain the frequent complaint of mental exhaustion in performing routine tasks by victims of brain trauma.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury

Bookmark:

Truck accidents involving trailer underriding or under-running -- where a car or other passenger vehicle passes under a trailer being pulled by a truck tractor or "big rig" -- remain severe personal injury accident hazards to automobile passengers in Georgia and elsewhere. Over the years, we have seen that catastrophic injuries -- including occupant death by decapitation, closed-head or brain injury, and spinal paralysis -- almost always result from these common tractor-trailer accidents.

Further, the trucking industry has taken the position that since no federal law specifically requires side underride protection, there is no need for same -- despite the clear risk of serious injury or death from side underride collisions, which are more frequent than rear underrides. Thus, the law still fails, in large part, to protect the motoring public from this devastating auto accident hazard.

Sadly, despite a federal law requiring truck trailers to have a rear underride guard or bar, many older trailers on our highways either still lack this basic safety feature. Also, a scary reality is that, with the spread inland of Mexico-based truck traffic from the Mexico border, border states, and eventually most of the country likely will see an increase in these always-serious wrecks. But, without stricter federal laws, jury verdicts will continue to be the only engine for change and improved motorist protection from these crashes.

For an excellent resource for learning more about these tragic, yet all-too-frequent, types of auto accidents, as well as for research into many other highway safety issues, we recommend the IIHS (http://www.iihs.org/research/topics/trucks.html), or Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, as a place to start your research.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our firm’s Georgia attorney’s have represented serious injury accident victims for many years who have been treated at various trauma centers. In Atlanta, most trauma patients are treated at Grady which is a Level-I facility. Trauma is any life-threatening occurrence, either accidental or intentional, that causes injuries. The leading causes of trauma are motor vehicle accidents, falls, and assaults. Trauma is the leading cause of death among Americans under 44 years of age. A trauma center is a hospital equipped to provide comprehensive emergency medical services to patients suffering traumatic injuries. Trauma centers were established as the medical establishment realized that traumatic injuries often require complex and multi-disciplinary treatment, including surgery in order to give the victim the best possible chance for survival and recovery.

In order to qualify as a trauma center, a hospital must meet certain criteria as established by the American College of Surgeons (ACS). Trauma centers vary in their specific capabilities and are identified by “Level” designation; Level-I (Level-1) being the highest to Level III (Level 3) being the lowest (some states have four designated levels, in which case Level IV (Level 4) is the lowest).

Higher levels of trauma centers will have trauma surgeons available, including those trained in such specialties as neurosurgeons and orthopaedic surgeons as well as highly sophisticated medical diagnostic equipment. Lower levels of trauma centers may only be able to provide initial care and stablisation of a traumatic injury and arrange for transfer of the victim to a higher level of trauma care. The operation of a trauma center is extremely expensive. Some areas are under-served by trauma centers because of this expense. For example, in Florida, Orlando Regional Medical Center was built to serve five counties but currently serves more than 20. A trauma center will often have a helipad for receiving patients that have been airlifted to the hospital. In many cases, persons injured in remote areas and transported to a distant trauma center by helicopter can receive faster and better medical care than if they had been transported by ground ambulance to a closer hospital which is not designated as a trauma center. In almost every case, the sooner a trauma patient receives the expert care afforded by a trauma center, the better the outcome.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Workers Compensation

Bookmark:

As Georgia injury lawyers we have seen the devastating effects of brain injuries which often result from automobile and truck accidents as well as on-the-job (workers compensation) injuries. A person who sustains a severe head injury and gets immediate, expert treatment has a better chance of having a more satisfactory outcome.

New research is being done with respect to effective treatment of head injuries immediately following head trauma. It has been reported in BioMed Central’s Journal of Biological Engineering that severe brain injury due to blunt force trauma could be reduced by application of a simple polymer, Polyethylene glycol or PEG, mixed in sterile water and injected into the blood stream. Andrew Koob and Richard Borgens from Purdue University, Indiana, performed experiments in rats which showed that PEG was effective in limiting damage if administered within four hours after the head injury. However, if treatment was delayed for a further two hours, the beneficial effects were lost. During the experiment, rats were injured with a falling weight and then PEG was administered fifteen minutes, two hours, four hours, or six hours later. The authors then carried out a series of behaviourial tests on the rats to determine the effectiveness of the PEG treatment.
According to Borgens, "These data suggest that PEG may be clinically useful to victims of traumatic brain injury if delivered as rapidly as possible after an injury". Such a treatment could be feasibly be carried out at the scene of an accident where PEG could be delivered as a component of IV fluids thus reducing long term brain injury.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Workers Compensation

Bookmark:

As Georgia trial lawyers we have handled a wide variety of slip and fall injury cases. While serious injuries from falls can occur at any age, it can be particularly serious for senior citizens. The elderly fear breaking a hip when they fall, but a government study indicates that hitting their head can also have deadly consequences: Brain injuries account for half of all deaths from falls. The study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the first comprehensive national look at the role brain injuries play in fatal elderly falls. It examined 16,000 deaths in 2005 that listed unintentional falls as an underlying cause of death. CDC researchers found that slightly more than half of the deaths were attributed to brain injuries. The other deaths were due to a variety of causes including heart failure, strokes, infections and existing chronic conditions worsened by a broken hip or other injuries sustained in a fall.
Each year, one in three Americans age 65 and older fall. About 30 percent of such falls require medical treatment. Previous CDC research showed that the U.S. death rate from falling has risen dramatically - about 55 percent - for the elderly since the 1990s. The new study highlights the role that brain injuries play in such deaths. The severity of brain injuries isn’t always immediately apparent, and some people may not lose consciousness. In our practice we have repeatedly noted a scenario seen in hospitals in which an elderly fall victim comes in alert and talking, but dies an hour or two later. The research is being published in the June issue of a scientific publication, the Journal of Safety Research.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Premises Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Not only must Georgia car accident, truck accident, and other personal injury victims fight the insurance companies to get a fair shake, but now days they must also swim against the tide of so-called “tort reform.” Brainwashed by propaganda, bought and paid for by the most dangerous industries and their insurers, potential jurors naturally come into court believing that all injured litigants are exaggerating - or worse. Sadly, we taxpayers often end up paying the medical and other bills that the wantonly, careless and dangerous today escape having to pay, thanks to “tort reform.” As an example, insurance companies recently tried to deny workers compensation benefits to the dependants of undocumented hispanic workers who were killed or seriously injured on-the-job. Fortunately, the Georgia Court of Appeals did not buy their arguments and recognized that it as another attempt for insurance companies who received a premium for the coverage, to shift the financial responsibility to state and federal government and taxpayers.
Car accidents and other personal injury victims normally require expensive healthcare, and lose pay checks while unable to work. If the insurer for the careless driver, dangerous company, defective product manufacturer or other “injury-causer” is not held liable for the injury, then the victim likely will have no choice but to let Medicaid pick up the healthcare tab, and let the Social Security system pay disability benefits to replace earnings. The bottom line is that either the “injury causer” pays, or you and I do. Another reality, unknown to most of the public, is that juries are kept in the dark about insurance companies’ involvement in almost all personal injury trials. Even though an insurer actually is behind the entire fight in almost all personal injury cases - paying for the defense lawyer and any judgment ultimately collected - the jurors never are told this in a typical personal injury trial. Furthermore, the injured person has to sue the actual “injury causer” himself, and not his insurance company. In actuality, insurance companies are intimately involved in all litigation, including selection and hiring “expert witnesses”, including physicians, to testify and give favorable “expert opinions”at trial. Most Georgia attorneys who handle personal injury, workers compensation and serious injury cases recognize the names of these “hired guns” because insurance companies use them over and over. Many of the “experts” earn a substantial part of their annual income doing nothing but “independent” medical examinations and then testifying.
We believe it is time for the public to learn the truth about these issues that is based upon hard evidence - data that is not the propaganda of those with a financial interest in not paying just claims. Along those lines, one article that appears to be an extensive and well documented resource on the truth about “tort reform” is “The Frivolous Case for Tort Law Change,” published in May of 2005 by the Economic Policy Institute. In it are many other resources documenting this simple fact: “Tort reform” clearly is a very elaborate, and successful, propaganda war being waged by those who either have political agendas and aspirations and those with a financial interest in not paying the claims of innocent people who have been injured and damaged by the negligence of others.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Torts

Bookmark:

Severe personal injuries - often including spinal paralysis, closed head injury brain damage, and even death - frequently result from vehicle damage that is sustained in rollover car accidents in Georgia and other states. According to April 19, 2007 Status Report published by the Insurance Institute For Highway Safety, nine vehicles, all SUV’s and pickups, have more than 75 deaths per million vehicles in single vehicle rollover crashes, compared with an average of 24 in all 2001-04 vehicles during 2002-05. This higher rate is largely because of their relatively high centers of gravity. The vehicle with the very highest death rate in rollovers is the 2-door, 2 wheel-drive Chevrolet Blazer. Its 134 deaths per million in rollover compare with an average 38 in all midsize, 2 wheel-drive SUV’s and 28 in 4 wheel-drive versions. According to this publication, not all midsize SUV’s have high death rates in single vehicle rollovers. For instance, at the time of the report, no driver deaths were reported in the 2 wheel-drive Lexus RX 330. This vehicle and increasing numbers of other passenger vehicles, especially SUV’s, are becoming equipped with standard or optional electronic stability control (ESC). This feature has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of fatal single-vehicle crashes including rollovers. More evidence that this ESC effectiveness is that all but 3 of 15 vehicles with the lowest overall death rates have this feature, usually standard (the Chevrolet Astro, Honda Odyssey, and Honda Pilot don’t). In contrast, ESC isn’t standard on any of the 16 vehicles with the highest death rates, and its optional on only 1 (the Nissan 350ZX). Accordingly, it is apparent that the ESC feature is an important feature in saving lives and reducing serious personal injury cases on Georgia highways.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As attorneys who represent the young man who is the most seriously injured surviving passenger in the Bluffton University Baseball Team's bus crash in Atlanta in 2007, we listened with great interest today to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) members explaining their findings about what caused the crash that took so many lives, and left so many injured.

Disastrous events such as this one can provide important "lessons" on how needless injuries and deaths can be prevented. Most disturbing about today's hearing was the sense that past lessons from other horrific wrecks have been ignored. Here is just some of what the NTSB discussed today (an official transcript will be available later):

The NTSB placed primary responsibility for the crash on the bus driver, who among other things veered onto an exit ramp at high speed (in excess of the speed limit), and failed to react by slowing the bus, apparently because he believed he was still in the HOV lane of I-75. As is well-documented, the bus then struck a railing on the overpass, and toppled from the overpass onto the interstate below, which caused many passengers to be ejected.

The NTSB discussed evidence that the driver had driven 10 1/2 hours the day before to meet this bus, and then started driving this bus at 4:30 a.m. with at most 6 1/2 hours of sleep. One NTSB member referred to the driver as an an "unqualified driver" because his medical certificate had expired, and noted that the bus company failed to monitor and instruct drivers as to their medical qualifications to drive. The NTSB had other criticisms as well.

What is also disturbing is the lessons not taken from the history of earlier fatal wrecks on this same exit ramp. The NTSB noted that this ramp had been the site of nine wrecks--three of them fatal--in the past, six of which had been single-vehicle wrecks. The drivers involved were not from the Atlanta area, the NTSB observed.

As one NTSB member stated, GDOT (the Georgia Department of Transportation) "missed the boat" in failing to identify the exit properly with adequate signage, and failing to install adequate traffic control devices, among other things, for the "unexpected" arrangement that drivers found at this exit. NTSB thus identified these failures as a contributing cause of the horrendous wreck.

The NTSB also discussed GDOT's failure to respond appropriately to the documented history of wrecks and fatalities at this same location.

The NTSB discussed the need for greater protection of occupants of buses. Prior bus crashes show that occupants are killed or injured because of the absence of simple protections such as seat belts--there were none on this bus. Here is one excerpt:

"The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the motorcoach driver’s mistaking the HOV-only left exit ramp to Northside Drive for the southbound Interstate 75 HOV through lane. Contributing to the accident driver’s route mistake was the failure of the Georgia Department of Transportation to install adequate traffic control devices to identify the separation and divergence of the Northside Drive HOV-only left exit ramp from the southbound Interstate 75 HOV through lane. Contributing to the severity of the accident was the motorcoach’s lack of an adequate occupant protection system."

We can only hope and pray that the lessons of the Bluffton crash--which should have been learned previously--will not be ignored this time.

The NTSB's own "synopsis" of its report appears below, and can be found at http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2008/HAR0801.htm:

Continue reading "NTSB Report on Bluffton University Bus Accident Illustrates Preventable Dangers Causing Personal Injury and Wrongful Death--Again and Again " »

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Products Liability , Torts , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Earlier this year our Atlanta attorneys settled a wrongful death case involving a bicycle accident which occurred inside the city limits. In that particular case, the bicycle rider, who lost his life, became entangled with loose utility wires hanging from a utility pole near a busy intersection on Peachtree Street. The evidence established that the utility wires had been in a state of disarray for several months but had not been repaired. Unfortunately, this wrongful death case is not an isolated incident. Just this past week, we were retained to represent an individual who may be paralyzed for life due to a road hazard apparently caused by the negligence of the general contractor, subcontractors and/or the Georgia Department of Transportation .

When roadways and bridges are designed by public authorities, obviously, where it is foreseeable that one riding a bicycle may use the roadway, it is necessary that precautions be taken to protect bicycle riders from serious injuries. As an example, a storm drain that runs parallel to the road is a hazard. If a bicyclist’s tires should fall into the storm drain and the drain runs parallel with the road, not perpendicular to it, obviously the cyclist could be thrown from his or her bike if the wheels of the bicycle fall into the drain. Similarly, if there are expansion joints in the road over bridges where there is a 1-3" gap in the road, the tire of a bicycle can fall into the gap again causing the bicyclist to fall and sustain serious injury. Thus, it is imperative that when roadways are designed that the safety of all users of the road be protected, particularly those who are the most vulnerable to serious injury which many times includes those riding bicycles and motorcycles.

Those riding bicycles know that when they go out on the road that they need to be extremely careful of other motorists. Drunk drivers abound and there are multiple hazards along the side of roadways. To find a hazard in the roadway or immediately adjacent to it, however, is not normally anticipated by the average rider. When a loose utility wire, an improperly installed storm grade or unguarded expansion joint is allowed to exist, serious injury and even death is foreseeable. Such conditions should not exist but sadly they do. Regrettably, it may very well be that litigation is the best tool available to address these safety failures. If significant money damages are awarded in such cases, those responsible for the safety hazards will be “hit in the pocketbook” and hopefully will be deterred from similar acts of negligence. Even if deterred from future acts this is little comfort for the present day victim of a preventable injury. Nonetheless, if it takes litigation to encourage safety reforms and prevent future injuries, so be it.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our personal injury lawyers have seen closed head injuries in every locale surrounding metropolitan Atlanta whether it be Austell, Snellville, Roswell, Alpharetta, Jonesboro, Sandy Springs or the other numerous locales near the city. Victims of closed head injuries oftentimes have the most serious injuries we confront due to swelling of the brain caused by the trauma. What we have learned from taking numerous medical depositions and researching these claims is that a serious head injury can have profound consequences for the victim in situation where there is no skull fracture, per se, but rather merely “a closed head injury.” A closed head injury occurs when the brain is shaken within the skull itself. The brain is subjected to trauma when the bicyclist falls off the bike onto the pavement and strikes his head or when the pedestrian is hit by the car and lands on the road, again striking their head. However an accident occurs, when a victim’s head is injured, if the skull is not fractured, all of the trauma is contained within the skull. This is why it is called a closed head injury, because there is no open wound or opening of the skull via a fracture. If the trauma to the head and skull are severe enough, the brain can swell inside the skull (with no place to go) which can cause permanent brain damage sometimes leading to a coma, a stroke or paralysis.

We have seen innumerable closed head injury cases which have had life altering consequences for the victims of such injuries. Sometimes these injuries are difficult to initially diagnose because there is no skull fracture or other obvious injury. However, if the victim begins manifesting problems with memory, speech and/or cognitive abilities, the medical profession then begins to investigate the cause of these problems which typically leads to an MRI of the brain. Sometimes the MRI will show the swelling and sometimes it will not. Sometimes a neuropsychological evaluation is necessary to make a proper diagnosis. The fact remains that head injuries can lead to serious brain injuries, which in turn, can lead to life altering consequences for the victims of “closed head injuries.”

If you or any loved one has been subjected to trauma due to the negligence of a third party and you have sustained a closed head injury, it is obviously imperative that you be seen by a doctor who has considerable experience in dealing with such cases. The same is true for any attorney employed to investigate and represent the victim of a negligent act which caused such an injury. If there is to be an adequate financial recovery in such cases, there must be an adequate understanding of the significance of the injury and the difficulty in treating it. In short, closed head injuries are usually very serious and must be investigated promptly and handled with the utmost care and diligence. Not only does one need competent medical assistance in these cases, if there is a claim to be brought against a negligent third party, competent legal counsel is also imperative for the victims of such injuries.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury

Bookmark:

In metropolitan Atlanta, our lawyers are seeing more and more pedestrian personal injury cases. Due to congested conditions caused by increasing population and more motorists on the road, as might be expected, there are more incidents involving pedestrians. Many cases involve situations where pedestrians are not in walking in crosswalks and are struck while crossing a road, sometimes in broad daylight. Other cases involve pedestrians crossing the road at night when they are difficult to see. Other cases involve joggers and people on sidewalks who are injured due to third party negligence. As might be imagined, these cases are typically very serious because when a pedestrian who has no protection is struck by a car, the injury is likely to be a very bad one.

In Georgia, every driver of a vehicle has duty to exercise due care to avoid colliding with any pedestrian upon a roadway and shall exercise proper precautions upon observing any child or obviously confused, incapacitated or intoxicated person. This law is found at O.C.G.A. § 40-6-93. The courts have held that this statute establishes that motorists on the highways must exercise ordinary care to both discover and avoid persons in the roadway.

Georgia is a comparative negligence jurisdiction which means that if the pedestrian fails to exercise proper care for their own safety then the jury can consider that in apportioning damages between the pedestrian and the at fault motorist. If a pedestrian is more negligent than the at fault motorist, the claim will be barred by the doctrine of contributory negligence. If the pedestrian is negligent but not as negligent as the motorist who causes the injury, then the negligent motorist can still be held liable but their liability is reduced by the percentage of the negligent pedestrian.

As these cases are always factually specific, it is imperative when serious injuries are involved that family members look after their loved ones by associating counsel at the earliest opportunity so that there can be an adequate investigation of the facts and so that witnesses with knowledge of the facts can be located and interviewed. These cases always turn on the facts so the more facts that are gathered, the better the analysis of the facts and the more likely it is that justice can be done either for the motorist who may or may not have been negligent and/or for the injured pedestrian.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

In our personal injury practice, we have seen evidence here locally of what has been documented to be a growing and national problem. We have seen more and more brain injury cases resulting from traumatic events, typically tractor-trailer accidents, automobile accidents or some other traumatic incident, many times caused by the negligence of a third party. We have also seen these cases in the context of serious on-the-job injuries. What we see here in our practice mirrors the growing nature of this problem. Indeed, according to the Brain Injury Association of America there are nearly seven times more traumatic brain injuries each year than there are breast cancer and HIV/AIDS cases combined. This is a staggering statistic that is not appreciated by the public and yet the numbers are compelling in demonstrating the significant nature of this problem.

In Georgia, the typical cause of traumatic brain injuries are accidental falls, motor vehicle crashes or being struck by an object. Violence accounts for another ten percent (10%) of the problems. When one suffers a traumatic brain injury typically, they have long term neurological and cognitive problems. The impairments caused by these injuries can be permanent and result in partial or total disability. Because the consequences of such injuries are often life altering, it is obviously necessary that medical care be made available immediately to those who are unfortunate enough to have suffered such an injury. Without prompt medical attention, the problems caused by these injuries can become complicated and can actually worsen over time. As we have written before, the problem caused by a traumatic brain injury is bad enough, in and of itself, but is only complicated and made much worse by the unavailability of appropriate medical care.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury

Bookmark:

The saddest personal injury cases we see in our serious injury law practice often times involves those who have suffered traumatic brain injury resulting from an automobile, tractor-trailer collision or some other traumatic event, with these tragedies being seriously compounded by the unavailability of insurance. While there has been some media attention on the number of uninsured individuals in this country who have no available health insurance coverage, the impact of this problem is not really seen or appreciated until one is confronted with overwhelming medical needs and there is a complete lack of medical coverage available to meet those needs.

One case we are currently handling involves a Hispanic gentleman who suffered permanent and irreparable brain damage. He was taken by life flight to the hospital where he was stabilized. Once he was stabilized, however, the hospital that had been treating him free of charge (because he had no health insurance) discharged him. After discharge, he no longer has the ability to seek appropriate medical treatment because he has no health insurance coverage and being from another country does not qualify for Medicaid or Medicare. His medical needs are overwhelming and yet he has no access to medical care in the richest country in the world.

This individual’s problem is no different in many ways from American citizens who are the victims of traumatic brain injury and do not have health insurance coverage. Oftentimes, the individuals involved may or may not qualify for Medicaid or other assistance. It takes years to qualify for Social Security disability benefits. In the meantime, after the traumatic brain injury has incurred and the patient is stabilized, the necessary ancillary services to a recovery, such as rehabilitation services, vocational and physical therapy and others are typically completely unavailable to the uninsured because they are not affordable and there is no way to get such treatment.

In these very tragic and sad cases, many times the only possibility of recovery for the injured individual is litigation against the party responsible for the traumatic event. While such cases can result in a financial settlement several years after the event, due to the cost and delay of litigation, nonetheless, sometimes its too little and too late for those who are in need of immediate medical care to address their injuries and insure a recovery.

The American Medical Association needs to take a hard look at whether it is doing enough to make medical care available to those who cannot afford it. While there are many clinics and other local, state and federal government facilities, those who have been seriously injured many times do not have access to the type of care that he needs. We even see this with our returning veterans from Iraq, much less the uninsured. This problem is a national problem and needs to be addressed at the local, state and federal level.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury

Bookmark:

Our Atlanta personal injury lawyers know that truck accidents on Georgia’s freeways continue to leave a legacy of death, paralysis, closed head brain damage and other personal injuries for numerous innocent victims.
I have read that almost 5,000 people are killed each year in truck-related crashes. Because of their size and often dangerous pay loads, automobile accidents involving commercial trucks are devastating to pedestrians and occupants of other vehicles. I was recently reading about the increase in Mexican truck traffic on U.S. highways since the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). By way of a little history, a 1982 U.S. ban kept Mexican trucks off most of the highways of our southern border states, leaving truck accidents to the domestic trucking industry. However, even after NAFTA took effect in 1994, the ban held until a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court ruling removed the ban and opened wide the gates to Mexican truck traffic. Despite efforts by consumer organizations concerned about truck accidents, car accidents, exhaust pollution and other public-safety issues, eventually Mexico-based trucks were allowed freely onto America’s roads. Given the likely substandard condition of these trucks, the likely lack of regulation of that industry in Mexico and the likely absence of driver training one has to wonder what the future holds. The reality is that we are all at greater risk of car accidents.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Truck wrecks occur more often than one would think in and near a busy city like Atlanta. When they do occur people often sustain very serious injuries and many such accidents result in the death of innocent people. The injury lawyers in our firm have “seen it all” when it comes to the causes of these tragedies. These causes run the gamut and include everything from simply not paying attention to driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol. We have even had a case where the driver switched seats with another driver while speeding down an interstate highway with a trailer loaded with steel.

When evaluating an injury or death case a lawyer must consider which theories of liability he will employ to hold the driver and the trucking company responsible. These may include: (1) negligent hiring, entrustment or retention of a driver, (2) negligent inspection, maintenance or repair of the truck and violations of Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. Many times, insurance companies that insure trucking companies actually make hiring decisions of drivers. Depending on the facts of a case, there may even be a negligent entrustment claim that can be made against the insurance company for the motor carrier. A good lawyer will leave no stone unturned when handling a truck wreck case.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our wrongful death and serious injury lawyers work with our clients on a contingency fee basis. The contingent fee is perhaps the one device that gives seriously injured people, no matter what their financial means, an even break in the courtroom against giant corporations and insurance companies. Contingent fee practice has been an essential part of the United States justice system for more than a hundred years. It permits every American regardless of wealth or social standing the opportunity to pursue a valid claim against even the most powerful corporation or individual. In a large measure, it has made our judicial system the envy of the world. It is no surprise that it has been under almost constant attack for years by corporations and insurance companies.

Increasingly, there have been calls by organizations sponsored in secret by large corporations and insurance companies, to abolish the contingency fee. Big businesses and individuals who want to avoid accountability for their negligent and reckless acts are pushing for special protections in state legislatures and in the U.S. Congress. These wrongdoers have initiated a less obvious line of attack on the American consumer, an attack that directs itself not of the consumer, but an easier target, the lawyers that represent them. Many of these attacks are coordinated by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Without the contingency fee, many people would never be able to bring a claim to redress wrongs done by large corporations and powerful individuals. In essence, the contingency fee allows a lawyer to advance his services and time in return for a percentage of the recovery. In this day and age, due to increasing burdens placed by the legislatures on claimants, the cost of bringing a lawsuit are extremely high. In fact, almost none of our clients could afford to bring a lawsuit without the contingency fee.

The assault on the contingency fee is nothing more than an attempt by powerful interests to deny access to justice to tens of thousands of Americans who are injured each year due to another’s wrongful acts.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Medical Malpractice , Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Liability , Police Chases , Products Liability , Torts , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

In serious injury and death cases our attorneys consistently face challenges from the defense to the testimony of our highly qualified expert witnesses. These challenges are based upon the rule of evidence known as the Daubert standard.

The Daubert standard is a legal precedent set in 1993 by the United States Supreme Court regarding the admissibility of expert scientific testimony during legal proceedings. In Daubert, the Supreme Court ordered federal trial judges to become the “gatekeepers” of scientific evidence. Trial judges were instructed to evaluate expert witnesses to determine whether their testimony is both “relevant” and “reliable”.

A two-prong test of admissibility was established. The relevancy prong refers to whether or not the expert’s evidence fits the facts of the case. The relevancy requirement has always existed in the law.

The reliability prong was new. The Supreme Court explained that in order for expert testimony to be considered reliable, the expert must derive his or her conclusions from the scientific method. The court then offered general observations of whether proffered evidence was based on scientific method including such things as empirical testing, peer review, the potential error rate, and whether the theory or technique is generally accepted by a relevant scientific community.

In practice, this standard has been burdensome, and grossly unfair to claimants in courtrooms. Trial judges are simply in no better position than juries to serve as “gatekeepers” to scientific evidence. In fact, many of these judges bring their own biases to their determinations. One example given is that under this standard, if Christopher Columbus were required to appear in a courtroom during his lifetime using the Daubert standard, his opinion that the world is round would have been inadmissible.

As part of the so-called Governor’s tort reform of 2005, the Daubert standard was adopted by the state legislature for use in Georgia. However, bowing to pressure from the Prosecuting Attorney’s of the state, who realized how gross unfairness of the Daubert standard, the governor and legislature exempted criminal cases from the Daubert standard. However, catering to the demands of the insurance industry and large corporations, the legislature adopted the Daubert standard for civil cases.

Currently pending before the Georgia Supreme Court is a case in which the Daubert standard is being challenged on constitutional grounds. An argument is being made that it denies equal protection to adopt the standard in civil cases and not in criminal cases. It will be very interesting to see how the Georgia Supreme Court handles this challenge, especially in light of the fact that in recent years, large insurance companies and corporations have thrown millions of dollars into the judicial races in attempts to elect candidates who will follow their agenda.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Civil Procedure , Dangerous Drugs , Medical Malpractice , Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Liability , Police Chases , Products Liability , Torts , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

When a client is so seriously injured that they may not be able to work again at the same job and will likely incur future medical costs, it may be prudent for the client to consider a structured settlement as opposed to a lump sum cash settlement if one is offered. Our attorneys have handled many serious injury cases where a structured settlement has truly been in the best interests of our client. This is particularly so in the context of cases where the client lacks financial sophistication and may need future medical assistance and may incur future lost wages.

Of course, the main hallmark of a structured settlement is a long term annuity which provides cash payment benefits usually over time, sometimes over the life of the client. Structured settlements can be set up in a variety of ways to provide for the client’s future financial needs. These annuity/structured payments can be paid monthly, annually, semi-annually and basically on any time schedule desired. The focus, of course, is to provide long term financial assistance for the client who may need it. If the client does not need long term financial assistance, then a structured settlement may not ever come into play. However, for those who are seriously injured, it is likely that they will need long term financial assistance. Because of the tax benefits of a structured settlement (the interest on the amount of the annuity purchased is not taxable to the client over the course of the annuity payments) in many cases it is advisable for the client to consider a structured settlement.

There are a lot of advertisements on television these days about how clients who have received structured settlements can “cash in” and receive their monies now. Obviously, these companies that offer to buy structured settlements do so at a steep discount thus essentially taking much of the client’s needed money away from them. Because some clients are poor money managers they often times they resort to these companies in order “to cash in” on their structured settlements and get a quick term cash infusion. This results in a huge loss to the client.

For our clients, we very carefully go over with them the pros and cons of structured settlements. They are not for everyone. However, in cases where the client will likely have problems in the job market and will likely incur future medical expenses, our experience has been particularly for those who are not financially sophisticated and/or capable of managing their own investments without assistance that theirs may be a case appropriate for this type of settlement. As long as the tax advantages of these structured settlements remain in place and as long as clients are informed about their options, we have found that many clients benefit from these types of settlements. While there will always be a cash portion of any such settlement, the structured portion can provide a much needed safety net for the seriously injured client well into the future.

Clients who have been seriously injured should always consul with experienced counsel about structured settlement annuities. They may be the very best option in the right case. Our experience has been that they can be extremely helpful for our clients, thus, our practice is to always discuss them with clients involved in serious injury cases.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Torts

Bookmark:

One of the many difficulties faced by attorneys who work on serious injury cases arises in the context of a catastrophic injury case involving a child. Many times, due to limitations on the extent of their medical knowledge, the doctors treating the child cannot always give an accurate prognosis for the child. Thus, it can be difficult when a child has been seriously injured to accurately predict how the injuries will manifest themselves as the child grows older. In some very sad cases, of course, one of the issues is whether the child will even reach maturity given the severity of the injuries. In other cases, however, where the child is expected to live a normal life span it is vital that a Life Care planner become involved to assist counsel in determining what the costs of the child’s future medical needs will be.">catastrophic injury case involving a child. Many times, due to limitations on the extent of their medical knowledge, the doctors treating the child cannot always give an accurate prognosis for the child. Thus, it can be difficult when a child has been seriously injured to accurately predict how the injuries will manifest themselves as the child grows older. In some very sad cases, of course, one of the issues is whether the child will even reach maturity given the severity of the injuries. In other cases, however, where the child is expected to live a normal life span it is vital that a Life Care planner become involved to assist counsel in determining what the costs of the child’s future medical needs will be.

Our firm has worked with several very reputable and qualified Life Care planners with considerable expertise in this area. The Life Care planner is truly an expert consultant when it comes to providing financial estimates of the long-term medical costs involved in treating seriously injured children. If a child has been severely burned or paralyzed, if a child has lost one or more limbs or is blinded, if the child has suffered brain injury, whatever the case may be, obviously, counsel for the child and their parents must take into consideration future medical costs and needs when evaluating what amount of money should be sought from the party who caused such damages through their negligence. A Life Care planner with sufficient expertise to extrapolate into the future such medical costs (when assisted as well by a competent economist) can provide valuable information to the attorney in determining what amount of money will be needed to protect the child’s future and thus can help formulate a settlement demand in a serious injury case.

In any case involving a catastrophically injured child, not only do we work with an economist and Life Care planner, we try to make sure in consultation with the doctors involved that we have a very good understanding of their belief about the child’s prognosis. Once we know what the prognosis is believed to be and we consult with the doctor by and through a qualified Life Care planner who consults with them, we then can ask an economist to project over time what amount of monies will be needed in the future to protect the child’s interests. Once we know the amount of money needed to pay for future medical needs we can factor that amount into an overall settlement demand for our client. If we cannot get that amount in settlement, then, of course, we are also in the position to produce the same evidence to a jury for its consideration in resolving the case if need be.

Any case involving a seriously injured child is always a sad one. Our attorneys have seen many times just how stressful and painful these cases can be for the families of such children. Of course, the tragedy inflicted on the child would be compounded if future medical needs could not be provided. While some cases are even more tragic because of the lack of available insurance proceeds to protect the child’s future, in those cases where there is sufficient liability insurance coverage available to protect the child’s future needs, a qualified Life Care planner can be, quite literally, a life saver in the future.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Civil Procedure , Torts , Trial Techniques

Bookmark:

As a Georgia personal injury lawyer, it never ceases to amaze me how the trucking industry lobbies to limit the rights of victims who either suffer wrongful death or serious injuries in truck accidents caused by negligent, careless, or drunk drivers.

In researching an issue last week, I ran across a website of the American Trucking Association who proudly listed, on a state-by-state basis, some of their legislative efforts to deny accident victims fair compensation. They published their "Tort Reform Scorecard 2006". Rather than concentrating their efforts on driver safety and other ways of preventing human tragedy caused by the negligent, if not criminal, operation of their trucks, they invest in trying to change the laws to limit what they have to pay to fairly compensate people with serious injuries. They seek to eliminate joint and several liability, limit or eliminate punitive damages and attorney fee awards. In some states, like Georgia and Alabama they have backed legislation limiting damages for non-economic damages.

Our firm recently settled a wrongful death case involving a truck driver using drugs who was found to have been hiding vials of urine under his belt in case he got caught and was subjected to drug testing!

In another recent case involving serious spinal injuries to our client, the truck driver switched driving positions with his friend who happened to be riding along for company. This friend who had no commercial drivers license had recently been scheduled for back surgery because he had a spinal cord injury as a result of being struck by lightening. The friend was taking prescription narcotic pain medication to ease his back pain and he had numbness in one of his legs. To top it all off they switched seats going south on I-75 at 70+ mph with a load of steel on the trailer!!

It is maddening to hear the trucking industry and other groups tout their alleged accomplishments which they refer to as tort reform. Trucking companies as well as all other businesses should be able to be held accountable for the actions of their employees who injure or kill innocent people and they should be required to make such victims completely whole for all of the damages those victims or their families sustain. "Reform" which limits an innocent victim's rights in favor of a corporations bottom line is wrong.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Torts , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Any trial lawyer who has ever handled a closed head injury case knows that brain damage can occur even if there is no direct blow to the head. Quite literally, the brain is like a bowl of Jell-O. If the head is shaken, the brain moves within the skull and due to acceleration and rotational forces, not necessarily direct blows, the brain can be damaged. Nor does an injury have to be severe to cause lasting brain injury. In short, a closed head injury without any skull fracture can result in more serious injuries than can an injury where a skull fracture has occurred.

Almost 20 years ago at the University of Virginia Medical Center in Charlottesville, a study of 424 people who had been hospitalized for 2 days or less revealed that after discharge, 79% complained of headaches, 59% of memory problems and 34% had not yet returned to their jobs 3 months later. Seventy-seven head injury patients who had been hospitalized for less than 24 hours and discharged with “normal” findings showed that a third later had difficulties with memory, attention span and concentration. In short, the data has been publicly available for years demonstrating that a closed head injury can cause serious long term complications for those unfortunate enough to have such an injury. Indeed, recovery from a brain injury, however minor it may seem, can last for years earmarked by periodic improvements over time.

In our practice, we have seen numerous symptoms of subtle brain damage. These often include a person who loses interest in their family or hobbies, people that have short attention spans or are unable to do their job, difficulty with relationships, trouble learning new things, sexual problems, etc. Many times, there is a lack of self-confidence and a lack of drive. In short, the brain is a very complicated organ, of course, and while the medical profession is still dealing with its attempts to understand closed head injuries, the fact remains that people who experience head injuries often times are not properly diagnosed initially and many times suffer from the side effects of such injuries for years.

Closed head injuries have been described in the past as a “silent epidemic.” As one expert has previously stated: “Someone in an accident is not necessarily fine just because they didn’t hit the windshield with their head.” Like any other medical problem, once a closed head injury is diagnosed, its causes and consequences can be better understood. And of course, a problem must be identified before rehabilitation techniques can be applied that may ease or correct the difficulty. While head injuries can oftentimes be fatal causing approximately 100,000 deaths a year in this country, about 7 times that number of individuals suffer non-fatal head injuries severe enough to require hospitalization. Some languish in comas, as has received much attention in recent years, but most suffer silently from the long term consequences of having their brain injured by trauma, sometimes only minor trauma.

While our lawyers know that these are tough cases, nonetheless, individuals who have sustained such serious injuries deserve not only good medical care but good legal representation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury

Bookmark:

Atlanta has previously been identified as one of the most dangerous large metropolitan area in the country for pedestrians. Although statistics are not always accessible, in the calendar year 2001, for example, 64 pedestrians were reported killed in Atlanta. Throughout the State of Georgia, more than two-thirds (2/3) of pedestrian fatalities occurred on neighborhood streets, which helps explain why pedestrian injury is the second leading cause of death for children age 5 to 9. Another problem, particularly prevalent in Atlanta, are unsafe sidewalks. While the City does not maintain statistics on the number of people who are injured while using city sidewalks, anyone who lives in the Atlanta area knows that city sidewalks are often in a state of disrepair and are dangerous to pedestrians who might wish to use them. Sidewalks in metropolitan Atlanta also rarely meet the needs of people with disabilities who make up a significant portion of the population. Despite federal requirements and long past deadlines, the City of Atlanta has been slow to take action to mitigate barriers that prevent people with disabilities from safely using the City’s sidewalks.

At a City Counsel work session in February of this year, Public Work Commissioner David Scott estimated that one-fourth (1/4) of Atlanta’s sidewalks were in need of repair. Mr. Scott also conceded that the problem with sidewalk maintenance in Atlanta could not be resolved with the resources at hand. Indeed, less than $125,000.00 is available in the City’s budget for maintenance issues, thus allowing for limited emergency maintenance only. With 25% of City’s sidewalks in need of repair, Commissioner Scott estimated that it would cost approximately $80 million for the City to make all the necessary repairs. What this means, of course, is that twenty-five percent (25%) of all city sidewalks, being in need of repairs, are unsafe.

With one-fourth (1/4) of the City’s sidewalks in need of repair, it is not surprising that there have been significant injuries reported. In one case, a bicyclist was killed while riding his bike near Peachtree Street and Peachtree Battle Avenue within the City limits. A utility wire had been draped across the sidewalk (allegedly for over a month) and the bicyclist came into contact with it such that he was thrown from his bike, landed on his head and was killed. In another tragic occurrence, a small child lost his leg when a loose utility wire which also partially obstructed a city sidewalk got caught up by a passing motorist’s vehicle and severed the boy’s leg as he was standing next to a utility pole, again on a city sidewalk. While these occurrences are tragic, it is clear that there are many more unreported injuries being sustained by pedestrians using Atlanta’s sidewalks. The question is, what can be done about this problem?

In future blogs, we will address ongoing efforts to deal with these chronic problems. What is clear, however, is that sidewalk maintenance in Atlanta is a significant problem which needs to be addressed by the City, sooner rather than later.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Premises Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Today we had the father of a young man in his early twenties come in to the office. His son was involved in an automobile accident and sustained serious injuries to his spine. It appears that he will be paralyzed for life from the waist down. The young man’s medical bills far exceed the liability insurance coverage, the hospital has filed a lien which will consume all of the available liability coverage and, to make matters worse, the young man has no health insurance.

Last month we got a call from a young man, an employee of a tree surgeon company, who fell from a tree. He was also sustained a serious spinal cord injury and was rendered a paraplegic. His employer had no workers’ compensation insurance and he had no health insurance.

Last year a young women who had been an employee of our firm 10 years ago, was involved in an automobile accident and sustained a permanent brain injury from which she will never recover. She had limited medical insurance to take care of her initial medical needs but nothing to take care of her long-term care. She is now being cared for, at home, by her husband and family.

Last week my firm received a letter from our group health insurer, advising us that our health insurance premium will be going up 49% for the coming policy year! No one has even had a significant claim of any type. This rate increase news comes at a time when health insurers are reporting record profits. How long can this go on? More and more businesses will be unable to provide health insurance to its employees.

It is my opinion that the medical/health insurance crisis faced by millions of Americans, in this country, is a disgrace. We are a phenomenally wealthy country and no American should ever be in a position of having no health insurance and no family should be put in a position such as those in the above referenced cases of having no safety net. In a country that can spend over a trillion dollars to wage a war in the middle east and rebuild economies of other countries, why can’t we provide basic healthcare to all Americans and catastrophic assistance to families whose lives have been devastated by catastrophic injuries? For those corporate types who feel secure in the knowledge that they have health insurance and disability coverage, watch out! Unless you are very wealthy, even you would be hard pressed to finance the care needed by a loved one who has sustained catastrophic injuries and will need life long 24/7 care.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury

Bookmark:

In our practice we frequently handle cases involving traumatic brain injuries. Traumatic brain injury can occur in a variety of ways. It can occur when there is a rapid acceleration and/or deceleration of the brain such as in an automobile collision whiplash scenario. Traumatic brain injury can also result when the head comes into contact with another object such as in a motorcycle accident, automobile accident, or a blow to the head. This type of injury is sometimes referred to as a “closed head injury.”

Injuries that result from traumatic brain injury can be long-lasting and sometimes difficult to prove, especially when there are no outward physical manifestations of the injury. In fact, a traumatic brain injury can be sustained, with life altering results, yet routine neurological examinations, MRI’s and CT’s will be normal.

We have seen that persons who suffer a traumatic brain injury of any type may experience physical, cognitive, and behavioral problems. Physical symptoms that result from traumatic brain injury include lethergy, fatigue, headache, vision problems, and sleep disturbances. Cognitive problems include the inability to concentrate or pay attention, difficulty with memory, difficulty with planning, and trouble either understanding or producing speech. Behavioral problems resulting from traumatic brain injury include mood swings, irritability, and lack of inhibition. Many of these problems may be mistakenly attributed to depression or other disease processes, when they are, in fact, a result of some sort of traumatic brain injury. This is especially true in cases of mild traumatic brain injury since there may be little evidence of physical injury.

It can be very difficult for a person who has suffered a traumatic brain injury to recover adequate damages for their injury. It is difficult to prove the lasting physical effects of any type of traumatic brain injury to the satisfaction of a judge or jury when there are no apparent physical injuries and when neurological exams return normal results. Because of this, it is a good idea to consult with a personal injury attorney who has experience in traumatic brain injury or brain damage cases.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury

Bookmark: