Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog

Miraculously, there have been no reported injuries or deaths following an accident in Atlanta, Georgia. Yesterday a portion of a concrete parking deck in downtown Atlanta collapsed near the intersection of Spring and 5th Streets, damaging or destroying 38 vehicles. The deck is a pre-fabricated, pre-cast concrete structure that was built eight years ago. The cause of the “pancake collapse,” where a section of the fourth floor fell onto the third, second and first floors, is still under investigation. Although the pre-cast concrete components of the structure were reportedly designed and manufactured by Greenville, S.C.-based Metromont Corp., Hardin Construction Company was the general contractor. Hardin Construction was also the general contractor in charge of building a bridge in Piedmont Park that collapsed earlier this year resulting in the on-the-job death of one worker.
Georgia residents may recall a somewhat similar accident a few years ago when the Phillips Arena was being constructed. Unfortunately two workers were crushed to death when some of the huge pre-fabricated, pre-cast concrete bleacher sections collapsed on top of one another after being welded into position. In a professional negligence case, the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP represented the widow of an ironworker who was killed. By working with experts who had been involved in large construction projects such as the Georgia Dome and Turner Field, we uncovered the reasons for the collapse. In litigation against eleven participants in the Arena construction, we obtained a very favorable settlement for our client.
The Georgia Injury Lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have over 40 years of experience pursuing wrongful death lawsuits, some of which have involved highway and road defects. If you have lost a loved one and feel you have a wrongful death claim, call our experienced attorneys at 1-800-228-9159 for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Construction Accidents , Torts , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Atlanta is the scene of another structural collapse. It has just been reported that a parking deck collapsed in the area of Spring and 5th Streets in the midtown area of Atlanta. At this time there are no reports of injuries or deaths, but the efforts of firefighters and rescue personnel to access the collapsed areas have just begun.

Our Atlanta, Georgia, lawyers have investigated and filed lawsuits in numerous construction and structural collapse cases. The most notable was the collapse during the building of Phillips Arena in Atlanta.

While we certainly hope that there are no injuries invoolved in this most recent collapse, there are many potential avenues by which a recovery for fatalities and serious injuries which can occur in such events.

There is potential liability against the designers and architects for improper or dangerous design. There may also be liability for the negligent installation or work of others. We have also successfully established liabilty for the furnishing or selling of defective components such as poorly mixed concrete or steel beams.

Injuries resulting from collapses or failure of equipment should always be explored and investigated thoroughly. The failure to do so can result in a deserving client or survivor settling for small benefits when a much larger recovery was probable

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Construction Accidents , Products Liability , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Georgia injury lawyers know that many times automobile accidents and tractor trailer truck accidents result from defects in either the design of a roadway or the existing dangerous condition of a roadway. This is particularly true if the roadway is under construction. Last week in Georgia, it was reported that a woman driving southbound on Interstate I-85 near Newnan, Georgia got a wheel off the edge of the pavement resulting in her losing control of her vehicle, crossing the highway median and hitting a tractor-trailer rig head-on. Sadly, the accident resulted in the woman’s death. Depending on the facts, the Georgia Dept of Transportation can be held liable for highway defects which cause injury of death.

The LA Times recently reported that a jury has ruled that the California Department of Transportation was partially negligent in a crash that killed two teenagers. According to the lawsuit, the agency knew that the rolling mountain road was unsafe prior to the accident. The jury agreed and awarded $6.3 million in damages to the families of those killed and a survivor injured in the accident.

The Georgia Injury Lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have over 40 years of experience pursuing wrongful death lawsuits, some of which have involved highway and road defects. If you have lost a loved one and feel you have a wrongful death claim, call our experienced attorneys at 1-800-228-9159 for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Bus Accidents , Highway & Road Defects , Motorcycle Accidents , Torts , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Georgia injury lawyers see people seriously injured by dangerous products of all types. Many dangerous products result in the wrongful death of their users. A grout cleaner which was once sold by Home Depot is one product alleged to have been dangerous. Dozens of product liability lawsuits over injuries allegedly caused by the tile grout cleaning product will go forward as general negligence claims, a federal judge has decided. However, in ruling on the multi-district litigation, U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. granted summary judgment in favor of Home Depot and five companies tied to the manufacturer and distribution of Stand ‘N Seal regarding consumer product safety claims. Although Home Depot didn’t manufacture the grout sealer, it is alleged that they did not remove the product from store shelves and continued to sell it to the public after they knew or should have know it was dangerous. The case is In re: Stand ‘N Seal Products liability litigation.
If you are a loved one has been injured as a result of using a dangerous product, contact the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Consumer Protection , Products Liability , Torts , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have represented many victims of dangerous products. The type and nature of these dangerous products runs the gambit. Products liability in Georgia has arisen primarily as a negligence concept and even today remains the most viable theory of products liability in terms of jury comprehension. It was announced this week that a federal judge in Atlanta is permitting dozens of product liability suits against Home Depot and the makers of a tile grout cleaner to proceed to trial on negligence claims; however, he has dismissed other claims that sought damages for violating federal consumer product safety laws. The product at issue, Stand ‘N Seal Spray-On Grout Cleaner, was produced exclusively for Home Depot according to court filings in the case. It is alleged in the case before the Court that the manufacturer of the grout sealer had been on notice, for more than a month before the victim purchased the product, about the potentially devastating health problems associated with its use. It was also alleged that the manufacturer delayed notification to the Product Safety Commission of the growing health complaints associated with the product’s use and that they withheld critical information that delayed a mandatory recall of the product. According to documents filed in the case, at least 2 people died and dozens were hospitalized after breathing vapors from the aerosol chemical spray product.

If you are a loved one has been injured as a result of using a dangerous product, contact the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Dangerous Drugs , Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Liability , Products Liability , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

A 70-year old north Georgia man burned to death Saturday after his tractor-trailer left the roadway and caught on fire. Rescue workers attempted to pull the man from the burning truck but were unable to do so in time to save him. Authorities did not know why the truck ran off of Interstate 85 and did not know whether the driver fell asleep .

Many tractor-trailer accidents are caused by a driver’s inattentiveness or fatigue resulting from the operation of a tractor-trailer for an excessive amount of time. Federal regulations prohibit a trucking company from allowing a driver to operate a tractor-trailer while the driver’s ability or alertness is impaired by fatigue, illness, or any other cause which would make it unsafe for the driver to operate the vehicle. These regulations also prescribe a maximum number of hours that a driver can be on duty during any day or week and require a driver to maintain a daily log of his work status. Georgia lawyers who handle serious personal injury and wrongful death cases against tractor-trailer companies know that a complete investigation of such a case involves the careful scrutiny of these log books.

If you or a loved one have been involved in an automobile accident or a tractor-trailer accident, consult the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP who have been handling serious injury and wrongful deaths for over 40 years.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Bus Accidents , Torts , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have written before about the potential liability one may have for ATV accidents, especially if it involves riding passengers. Not only does the owner of the ATV risk being sued for injuries or death caused by their use of the ATV, but they may also find that there is no liability coverage available to them when they are sued. Last week, the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of summary judgment to Allstate Insurance Company in its suit seeking a declaration from the Court that it had no duty to provide coverage, a defense or indemnification arising out of an accident, in which a young girl was thrown off the back of an ATV whose owners had a homeowners policy through Allstate. The court held that the accident in question fell under the policy’s exclusion for bodily injury arising our of the ownership or use of a motor vehicle, which is designated principally for recreational use off public roads when an insured person owns that vehicle and it is being used away from an insured premises. The accident here occurred at a field located approximately 15 miles from the insured’s home. Accordingly, although from a liability standpoint, there may be a number of viable claims that can be made against the owners of ATVs for their negligent operation of the ATV, there is often no insurance coverage available to compensate injured victims. If you or a loved one have been injured as a result of an ATV accident consult the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Premises Liability , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Georgia citizens continue to suffer serious injuries and death in ever increasing numbers on a stretch of Interstate 85 near Newnan, Georgia. Most of these accidents involve tractor-trailers. According to authorities today, one person was killed and another person seriously injured on Monday afternoon in an accident on the northbound side of Interstate 85. Shortly after the initial fatal accident, a second major accident with injuries occurred when a northbound tractor-trailer rear-ended another that had stopped for the first wreck. Many of these accidents have occurred as a result of dangerous conditions existing upon the roadway which has been under construction for at least the last two years. The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP currently represent the family of an individual in a wrongful death case that resulted from vehicles hydroplaning on that stretch of road. The three most common reasons for hydroplaning are speed, condition of tires and excessive water on the roadway.

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have been handling serious injury and wrongful death cases for over 40 years. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured as a result of the negligence of someone else, call us for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Bus Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Over the years, our lawyers have handled many different cases involving serious injuries to children. These injuries arise in a myriad of contexts and are oftentimes heartbreaking. Over the years, we have had serious burn injury cases, dog bite cases,unsafe premises, sexual abuse cases, car accidents, medical malpractice cases, drowning accidents, playground injuries,unsafe consumer products, school injuries and the like, all involving young children. Some of these cases have resulted in wrongful deaths, comas, paralysis, burns and amputations. Presently, we are handling injuries to children involving negligence by daycare providers and owners of dogs who have allowed them to wander free of restraint and attack innocent children. Depending upon the severity of injuries sustained, these cases can affect the injured child permanently and the emotional, physical and psychic trauma can require very close attention to the needs of the young child. There may be permanent scarring involved; there may be the need for future treatment or medical surgery and there may be a diminution in the individual’s ability to earn and labor in the future and support themselves. While every case is unique, representing an injured child in a serious injury case is an undertaking that requires care and attention and an analysis of whether the injuries sustained will affect the child for the balance of their life. If so, obviously, greater attention to detail is needed than would otherwise be the case.

All cases involving children which result in a settlement or verdict have to be reviewed by the Probate Court system here in Georgia. The money from a settlement belongs to the child, not to the parents. While the parents are entitled to be reimbursed for any medical and out of pocket expenses that they incur, any other portion of the settlement must be placed in an interest bearing account set up for the lifetime benefit of the child. Such a fund must be held in trust until the child turns 18 but can be used for educational, medical or other needs of the child before they turn 18, however, such use is subject to Probate Court approval and supervision. Many Probate Courts take the position that the parents have to provide for the child until they reach the age of majority and therefore many courts will not allow parents to encroach upon any settlement funds as a way of discharging their own responsibilities. However, in certain cases, where the needs of the child are great, funds set aside for medical treatment and educational needs can be used, again subject to Probate Court supervision and approval.

When a child playing in the street darts in front of a car chasing a ball, and is seriously injured, the question arises, of course, whether there is any negligence claim at all against a third party. Many times children are killed or injured because of a lack of proper supervision by their parents and/or because of the child’s own negligence. Oftentimes, however, serious injuries to children occur which are entirely preventable and are caused by the negligence of third parties. We see this in the context of dog bite cases, automobile wrecks, daycare injuries, drowning accidents and the otherother similar cases referenced. Regardless of the circumstances involved which lead to the injury, care must be taken to make sure that the child that is properly represented and that the child’s needs are met. Our experienced serious injury lawyers share the common goal of properly representing injured children and assisting their families in obtaining the justice and compensation they require. If your child has been injured as a result of preventable accident caused by the negligence of a third party, call us today at 1-800-228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Physical and Sexual Assault , Premises Liability , Products Liability , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers have written before that with the growing popularity of ATV’s or All-Terrain Vehicles, serious injury and death cases are on the increase in Georgia, especially among children. Today I read about a tragic case that occurred on May 16th in South Carolina. In that case, a 15- year-old girl was riding on the seat behind her 32 year old neighbor when the neighbor lost control of the vehicle and the two were ejected. As a result, the teen sustained spinal cord injuries and is now paralyzed. According to police, the driver was operating the ATV at a high rate of speed and neither of the riders was wearing a helmet. The ATV was not designed to carry passengers. Moreover, the driver allegedly tested positive for marijuana. As a result of the accident, the driver has been criminally charged by authorities. Almost all ATV fatalities or serious injuries occur while violating one or more of the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s “Rules of ATV Operation”and this case was no exception. These rules are as follows:
A. Children under sixteen should not ride adult-sized ATV (engines bigger than 90 cc’s).
B. Take a hands-on safety course.
C. Always wear a helmet while on an ATV.
D. Never drive an ATV on paved roads.
E. Never drive while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
F. Never drive an ATV with a passenger, and never ride as a passenger.

Despite these common sense rules, we continue to see children operating ATV’s and worse yet, operating them with passengers. Every new ATV that has come from the factory in recent years has a decal that warns the driver not to ride passengers. An adult who negligently rides a passenger on an ATV who is subsequently injured may subject themselves to civil liability for doing so. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured on an ATV, call the ATV injury lawyers at Finch McCranie LLP at 1 (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our Atlanta lawyers recently completed a case involving a tire failure on a truck.. This past Tuesday, in a case being watched nationwide by product-liability attorneys, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court a ruling that allows a wide-ranging review of Cooper Rubber & Tire Co. records.

The case in which the ruling was issued, involves Cooper made the tires on a Chrysler 15-passenger van, which rolled several times after the left rear tire blew as Utah State University students were headed back to campus from a field trip in northern Utah's Box Elder County. Eight students and an instructor died in the Sept. 26, 2005, crash, and two students survived with severe injuries.

The survivors and the families of all but the instructor and another student are plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit, filed a year after the accident. The families settled their claims last year against DaimlerChrysler Corp., the maker of the van.

The lawsuit alleges that Cooper Tire knew the design and manufacture of its tires were faulty and did not fix the problems. The plaintiffs’ attorneys wanted to see documents pertaining to the design and manufacture of similar Cooper Tires.

A United States Magistrate Judge initially ordered that Cooper Tire afford wide access to company documents requested by lawyers for the victims of the crash and their families. His ruling was later affirmed by the United States District Court. Cooper Tire then appealed the order and argued at a hearing last year before the Denver-based 10th Circuit that it would require the company to divulge trade secrets and other proprietary information.

The appeals court rejected Cooper’s argument that the order was too broad. The lawsuit, brought in U.S. District Court in Utah a year after the accident, had been stalled for 15 months while the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals considered Cooper Tire's appeal.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Civil Procedure , Consumer Protection , Products Liability , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

We read yesterday in the paper about a tragic case in Charlotte, N.C. involving a police chase which resulted in the death of an innocent 84-year old woman who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time and got caught up in the chase, resulting in her death. According to the news reports of the incident, the police were chasing a suspected shoplifter who had committed a petty offense at a local shopping mall. Although the news reports are sketchy, it appears that the merchant called the police and shortly thereafter the police spotted the vehicle being operated by the suspected thief. A three mile chase ensued at high speeds and during the chase, the suspect lost control of his vehicle and struck the vehicle being operated by the innocent victim. Her death resulted. The petty thief has now been charged with murder.

We have blogged before in the past about the reasons why there should be policies prohibiting these kinds of chases. The death penalty to the innocent is the end result and in our judgment the death of this innocent lady cannot be justified by the need to apprehend a suspected petty thief. The news reports are sketchy as to what was stolen, but it appears that it was merchandise probably worth less than $100.00. In order to apprehend a petty thief, the police made a decision to expose innocent members of the motoring public to the possibility of serious injury or death. When balancing the risk to the public caused by a dangerous high speed chase against the need to apprehend the offender, it is our judgment, and that of many experts in the field, that public policy demands that in such circumstances, when the police are chasing a non-violent offender, they should terminate such a chase because it is foreseeable that an innocent third party might be seriously injured or killed if they do not. Because this chase happened over a three mile span, the police should have known that the suspect was not going to pull over and that the risk to the public caused by the chase itself was a greater danger to the public than was the suspect himself.

The police are defending the chase, as they always do. They are stating that the suspect was found to be on probation and had a criminal record for other theft offenses. These facts, probably discovered after the fact, were probably not known to the pursuing officer. Facts discovered after an incident can hardly justify an officer’s actions at the time of the incident. In this case, according to the news accounts, the officer only knew that the suspect he was pursuing at high speeds was a petty thief. Why would the police condone a chase where a death occurs when the need to apprehend was so slight and the danger to the public presented by a petty thief was far less than the danger to the public presented by the chase itself?

Of course, we do not know all the facts surrounding this case and can only base our views on what little information has been publicly released. Nonetheless, it is our strong belief and that of many experts throughout the country, including many involved in law enforcement, that law enforcement must do a better job of policing itself and must not condone dangerous high speed police chases in the context of a non-violent offense where the suspect/offender poses little or no danger to the public and the chase itself poses considerable dangers, oftentimes resulting in serious injury or death. This tragic case in Charlotte is no different from many others throughout the country. Indeed, our firm is handling a similar case in Augusta where the police were chasing two shoplifters which resulted in the death of three individuals. We pose the question: Was the death penalty to the innocent justified by the need to apprehend the suspect and the danger to the public presented by the petty thief? We think not.

Continue reading "Police Chase For Non-Violent Crime Turns Deadly" »

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Police Chases , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

In a wrongful death case where the deceased individual is survived neither by a spouse, child or parent, under Georgia law such a cause of action would vest in the Executor or Administrator of the Estate. In short, there will always be someone able to proceed on behalf of the “heirs-at-law” and such an individual, once duly appointed, will proceed in a fiduciary capacity to protect the rights of the heirs-at-law relative to the wrongful death action. Thus, if an individual dies and is neither married, has children or is survived by parents, but does have siblings as an example, then the siblings could sue for the wrongful death of their sibling subject to a pro-rated distribution of the proceeds in the event of a recovery. If an only child is involved, a representative of the estate could be appointed to proceed on behalf of other relatives. In short, if the death is wrongful, Georgia law recognizes that someone must be allowed to pursue the claim even if it means seeking representation on behalf of the decedent’s estate.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

In Georgia, if an individual loses her or her life due to the negligence of a third party and is not survived either by a spouse or children, the cause of action for the wrongful death of such an individual vests in the surviving parents. If both parents are alive, the cause of action is vested jointly in the parents if they are living together. If one parent is deceased, the right is in the surviving parent. If both parents are living, but are divorced, separated or living apart, the right shall be in both parents but either parent may proceed on behalf of the other. In such a case, the non-participating spouse is bound in the action brought by the other spouse.

If an individual is killed due to the negligence of a third party and that person was born out of wedlock, under Georgia law, such a fact shall be no bar to recovery and a surviving parent can sue for the wrongful death of his or her child. However, failure of a parent to provide support for the child during his/her life can diminish the parent’s right to share in the recovery. In short, if the surviving parents are separated or divorced, under Georgia law, the Court will determine an equitable apportionment of any wrongful death recovery based on the nature and extent of relationship of the parents to the deceased child.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

In Part I of this series, we set forth the provisions of Georgia law for wrongful death actions where surviving spouses were involved. In this article, we shall address actions by surviving children under Georgia’s wrongful death statute where a spouse does not survive to bring such a case.

If a parent is killed due to the negligence of a third party and is not survived by a spouse but is survived by children, the cause of action for the wrongful death vests with the surviving children. The fact that a child is born out of wedlock is not an issue and all surviving children are treated equally. A minor child has to bring such an action through a responsible adult or a Court Appointed Guardian. Step-children, however, have no right to pursue a wrongful death action for the death of their step-parent.

If a single parent is killed, such as a single working mother, obviously, a surviving ex-spouse has no right to bring the claim for wrongful death because such a claim belongs to the children and not to an ex-spouse. If the ex-spouse, however, is appointed as a Guardian of the children born between the two, such an ex-spouse could be appointed by the Court to protect the interests of the children. However, any recovery for the wrongful death of the deceased single parent would belong solely to the children and the ex-spouse could collect nothing in his or her own individual capacity, but would rather proceed solely in a fiduciary capacity.

Under Georgia law, as set forth in our prior article, if a deceased individual is married at the time of his or her death, the surviving spouse has the cause of action and may file a wrongful death lawsuit to recover, not only for themselves, but also for any surviving children.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

One of area of confusion to the public is determining who has the right to bring a wrongful death action in Georgia. Because our firm handles many such cases in Atlanta and throughout the State, we have decided to blog on this area of the law so that the public will better understand the provisions of Georgia law which control wrongful death actions.

In this article we shall focus on the rights of a spouse who is married to an individual killed by the negligence of a third party. In all such cases, where the decedent is married at the time of death, only the surviving spouse may bring a wrongful death action. Interestingly, however, any spouse that brings a wrongful death action on behalf of a deceased partner does so in a fiduciary capacity if children are involved.

O.C.G.A. § 51-4-2(a) provides that:
“The surviving spouse, or if there is no surviving spouse, a child or children, either minor or sui juris, may recover for the homicide of the spouse or parent the full value of the life of the decedent, as shown by the evidence.”

What this code section means is that if an individual is killed through the negligence of a third party and the decedent is married, the surviving spouse has the right to bring a wrongful death action in Georgia courts. If the deceased individual was not only married but had children, then the surviving spouse has to divide any recovery with such children on a pro-rata basis provided the surviving spouse shall in no event receive less than one-third (1/3) of the recovery as such spouse’s share.

If a married individual dies and has children, as stated, only the spouse may file a wrongful death action in Georgia. A child has no right to bring a wrongful death action if the parent is living unless the spouse refuses to bring such an action. While the spouse is vested under Georgia law with the sole authority to bring the lawsuit, if there is a collection by way of a jury verdict, a judgment or settlement, the spouse has to divide the proceeds equally with surviving children provided the spouse shall in no event ever receive less than one-third (1/3) of the total amount collected, minus attorney’s fees and expenses where applicable. The fact that a child has been born out of wedlock is no bar to recovery by that child with respect to such child’s pro-rata percentage of any settlement funds.

What is interesting about Georgia law is that a surviving spouse owes a duty to surviving children and can even be held liable to them for breach of that duty as their representative. Any lawyer representing a surviving spouse who pursues a wrongful death action must take care to protect the interest of all beneficiaries, both in prosecuting the claim and in disbursing the proceeds of a Georgia wrongful death case.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

When I was in high school, I was hired as a forklift driver at a textile plant. I was given no training whatsoever, had never operated a forklift and within hours was lifting huge pallets of heavy materials high into the air for placement on warehouse shelving. Fortunately, I did not injury anyone or kill myself, but I easily could have. Indeed, that same summer a high school friend of mine lost his life when he accidently drove a forklift backwards off of a loading ramp, killing himself in the process.

Just a month or two ago, here in Atlanta, I read about a news story where one employee at a car dealership was training another employee on how to drive a forklift when the co-worker overran the employee killing him. Here at Finch McCranie, we have represented individuals who were involved in industrial accidents where they were struck by forklifts inside of manufacturing facilities. These cases typically result in very serious personal injuries involving amputations, paralysis or death. Incredibility, my experience in high school is repeated over and over again as oftentimes the operator of these forklifts has been provided little or no training. Today, this is a violation of OSHA regulations. It was not in the 70's and 80's.

Forklifts are very heavy and very dangerous industrial vehicles involved every year in a large number of deaths and serious injuries in the workplace. Many of the injuries and fatalities committed while these vehicles are being operated could have been prevented if the operators had been properly trained and/or had properly protected themselves. Oftentimes, the operators of these vehicles are not wearing seatbelts and/or seatbelts are not even provided for their use. If such a vehicle overturns, because of its weight, the operator can be crushed.

Because many of these industrial accidents are preventable, proper training standards should include specified training, seatbelts, overhead protective devices, alarms and proper maintenance of these forklift trucks. If these dangerous vehicles are not properly maintained and/or the operator is not properly trained, serious accidents are foreseeable.

One reason the public may not be as aware of these types of accidents is because they are typically covered by workers’ compensation where lawsuits are not involved. If one employee injuries a co-employee, the claim is covered by workers’ compensation laws not by liability statutes. However, our firm has been involved in cases where a forklift driver injured a third party, not a co-employee, such as a truck driver or another person present on a plant’s premises when the forklift was being operated. In such cases, litigation oftentimes ensues, again, because the injuries are very serious and the victim typically is permanently disabled and unable to work again. Lawsuits can be a determent to other claims but this provides little comfort for the victim, as we have seen in the past.

If one goes on any search engine one will find the term “forklift accidents” to be somewhat ubiquitous. This is proof in and of itself that these heavy industrial machines are capable of inflicting serious injury and wrongful death if not properly operated. Regrettably, based on the number of these industrial accidents each year, we anticipate that third parties will continue to be injured by these dangerous instrumentalities at an ever increasing pace until and unless there is a greater state or federal penalty for failing to properly train the operators of these machines. OSHA penalties are typically small. Therefore, the biggest financial penalty that can be imposed as a determent may be a lawsuit and jury verdict.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Torts , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As a Georgia injury lawyer, I read almost everyday about a death or serious personal injuries sustained as a result of an All Terrain Vehicle ATV accident. With the increasing popularity of ATVs it is inevitable that there will be more accidents and injuries; however, most are preventable. Without exception, most ATV accidents can be traced back to a rider who broke at least one of the ATV Safety Institute’s Golden Rules. Whether you’re riding in a public park or on private land, keep these eight guidelines in mind:

Always wear a helmet and other protective gear.

Never ride on public roads — another vehicle could hit you.

Never ride under the influence of alcohol or other drugs.

Never carry a passenger on a single-rider ATV.

Ride an ATV that’s right for your age.

Supervise riders younger than 16; ATVs are not toys or baby-sitters.

Ride only on designated trails and at a safe speed.

Take an ATV RiderCourse; visit www.atvsafety.org or call (800) 887-2887.

In my experience, one of the most violated guidelines involves riding passengers. Over and over I read about children riding other children on the back of a single rider ATV. This is extremely dangerous and it is a parent’s responsibility to make sure that it does not occur. A parent who provides an ATV to a child and fails to supervise the child’s operation of it can be held liable in damages for the death of another person who is injured or killed in an accident. If you or a loved one have been seriously injured by someone negligently operating an ATV, call one of the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Brain Injury , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Georgia injury lawyers, handling a claim for a catastrophically injured employee or the family of a deceased employee, our investigation will often reveal that the employee received injuries while working on or around a piece of machinery that caused the death, some traumatic amputation or other trauma to the employee. In such a case, the attorney must consider potential product liability claims, such as defective design, manufacture, assembly, testing or failure to warn or misrepresentation. The Supreme Court of Georgia has outlined the test for whether a product is defective in terms of risk-utility analysis. There are three (3) principal basis of recovery in product liability actions: Negligence; Breach of Warranty; and Strict Liability.

Like any other claim, actions for damages based on product liability are governed by statutes of limitations. For personal injury actions based on negligence or strict liability related to product liability, a two year statute of limitations applies. However, there is an additional limitation that an attorney representing an employee injured by a product of any kind must consider as soon as he is retained. This is the statute of repose and it functions in addition to the statute of limitations. This statute of repose is a complete band to strict liability and negligence actions filed more than ten (10) years after the date of the first sale or use or consumption of the products, regardless of when the injury occurred. Thus, an injured employee’s time to file a case could be much less than two years. The statute of repose does not apply to claims based on failure of the manufacturer to warn of product related damage.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured on-the-job, call the Georgia workers compensation lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Products Liability , Torts , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Georgia and South Carolina injury lawyers are seeing ATV accidents involving serious injury and sometimes death are on the rise with the return of warm weather. Tragically many, if not most are preventable by using common sense and obeying ATV rules. Just this week, I read about a Summerville, South Carolina teenager who is fighting for her life as a result of being thrown from the back of a fast moving ATV. According to witnesses, neither the 32 year old ATV driver or the teenage passenger were wearing helmuts.

Almost all ATV fatalities or serious injuries occur while violating one or more of the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s “Rules of ATV Operation”. Those rules are as follows:

1. Children under sixteen (16) should not ride adult-sized ATV (engines bigger than 90 cc’s).
2. Take a hands-on safety course.
3. Always wear a helmet while on an ATV.
4. Never drive an ATV on paved roads.
5. Never drive while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
6. Never drive an ATV with a passenger, and never ride as a passenger.

Despite these common sense rules, we continue to see children operating ATV’s and worse yet, operating them with passengers. Every new ATV that has come from the factory in recent years has a decal that warns the driver not to ride passengers. As demonstrated by the tragic accident involving the South Carolina teen, serious injuries can result from riding as a passenger on the back of an ATV. Adults who operate an ATV in violation of the rules potentially subject themselves to civil liability for their negligence, if someone is seriously injured or killed as a result of their negligence. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured on an ATV, call the ATV injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP at 1 (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Brain Injury , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Defective medical devices can lead to the serious injury or death of innocent people. For this reason Georgia injury lawyers representing victims of defective and dangerous products were dismayed when the Supreme Court decision in Riegel v. Medtronic, held that consumers can’t sue medical device companies over medical devices that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Now, victims of these dangerous products who say they were injured by faulty medical devices want Congress to pass legislation called the Medical Device Safety Act, that would override the Supreme Court decision.

Congressional Lawmakers are scheduled to hold a hearing this week on legislation that would nullify a Supreme Court decision that prevents consumers from seeking damages for injuries caused by federally approved medical devices. Support for the Medical Device Safety Act has been fueled by news of the Sprint Fidelis Pacemaker Wire and other faulty medical devices. Although device makers argue that the Bill will have a chilling effect on medical innovation and patient safety, there is no evidence to support such a conclusion. To the contrary, such a bill would enhance patient safety and make manufacturers accountable for faulty medical devices

If you or a loved one have been seriously injured as a result of a faulty medical device, contact the product liability lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP for a free consultation..

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Consumer Protection , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As the popularity of ATV’s (all-terrain vehicles) increases the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP see more ATV accidents resulting in death and serious injuries each year. Even experienced riders must be very careful when operating an ATV. On April 18th of this year, former Utah Congressman Bill Orton, age 60, died while operating his ATV. According to authorities, he was riding out on the sand and went off a very steep sand dune, and when he impacted the bottom, the front end of the four-wheeler flipped on top of him, fatally injuring him. At the time of his accident, he was wearing a helmet.

According to ATVSafety.gov, a web site maintained by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, there were 268 “reported” ATV deaths in Georgia 1982 and 2007; however, this figure is likely low.

Experience is important when operating an ATV. All new riders should take a training course. These courses are offered nationwide and are usually offered free when purchasing an ATV from a dealer. Although many ATV injuries or deaths result from careless operation of the machine, many result from the negligence of third parties. Some accidents are the result of dangerous products like faulty brakes or steering components. If you or a loved one has been injured on an ATV, take care to preserve the ATV, including all parts, and consult one of the Georgia ATV injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Motorcycle Accidents , Products Liability , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

When the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP represent an injured employee in a workers compensation case we always look to see if there is a liable third party that can be sued. Under Georgia law, workers compensation benefits are limited and rarely, if ever, fully compensate an injured worker for all of the injuries and damages sustained.

Recently I read about a Chicago area wrongful death case involving a BMW car salesman who was killed in an automobile accident while accompanying a 20 year old potential car buyer on a test drive of a BMW automobile. According to court testimony, the driver was driving at 95 miles per hour when he crashed the car, killing the car salesman. The family of the salesman sued and a Chicago jury returned a verdict of 13.7 million dollars in their favor.

Other potential third party cases might involve defective or dangerous products that a worker might be using that cause serious injury or death. If you or a loved one has been serious injured in an on-the-job injury you should consult with the workers compensation lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP to protect your rights.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Products Liability , Torts , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have previously posted on the danger posed by defective grinding wheels that explode or disintegrate. When a grinding wheel comes apart, it can result in serious eye injury and even death. Although there are several reasons why these wheels fail, it is thought that many of these are inferior, imported products.

To prevent injuries, the following procedures are recommended when using grinding wheels:

* Check the wheel before each use for any cracks or chips. If any are found, discard
and replace with a new wheel.

* Perform a ring test. Wipe the wheel clean. Hold the wheel through the center hole with one finger. Using the plastic end (not rubber coated) of a screwdriver, tap the wheel on side. If it gives a metallic ring, the wheel is fine. If it is cracked, it will give a dull ring, or no ring at all.

* Always adjust the tool rest to sit no more than one-eighth (1/8) of an inch from the wheel. If it cannot be adjusted to sit at that width, the wheel is probably worn and should be replaced.

* Follow manufacturer’s instructions on replacing a wheel.

* Make sure that the new grinding wheel is rated to operate at the maximum speed of the grinder. Do not surpass the maximum speed.

* When beginning grinding, do not grind on a “cold” wheel. Apply the work gradually to “warm up” the wheel.

* Always wear the proper personal protective equipment: safety glasses/face shield, gloves, aprons.

* Use the guard at all times, no matter how small the job. Never alter or remove the guard.

* Before using a new wheel, turn it on, stand to the side, and watch for any abnormalities. It is recommended that a user allow the grinder to run for a minute before beginning to grind.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured as a result of a grinding wheel failure, it is critically important to preserve whatever evidence is available. Accordingly, not only should the tool itself be preserved for inspection but also all of the fragments of the grinding wheel should be collected and kept so that they can be analyzed by an expert. As always, the product liability lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP stand ready to consult with you about dangerous products.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Products Liability , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Recently an Atlanta eye surgeon told one of the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP that his group sees at least two new patients a month with serious eye injuries caused by grinding wheel accidents. Often times , the hazards of using a grinding wheel are overlooked. When using a grinder there are several potential hazards to of which you should be aware. They include: cuts and amputations; eye injuries from flying particles; punctures from work piece or debris; hearing loss from noise; and inhalation of toxic materials, including dust and silica.

Exploding grinding wheels pose a very serious risk to users. For instance, the United States Department of Labor published “A Partial List of Accidents Involving Grinders” for the period of 1990 through 1997. Out of 27 accidents, 7 of them resulted in death as a result of the victim being struck by pieces of a disintegrating grinding wheel.

In terms of grind wheel safety, there are several things to keep in mind.

* Grinding wheels have a shelf life and you should use grinding wheels within two (2) years of their manufacture date.

* Improper mounting of the wheel to the tool can cause the wheel to break.

* Using a wheel at a speed greater than that for which it was designed can lead to failure.

* Personal Protection Equipment should ALWAYS be used when using a grinder.

It is thought that one reason for the number of grinding wheel failures may be that many of them may now involve imported and inferior wheels. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured as a result of an exploding or disintegrating grinding wheel it is critically important to preserve as much of the evidence as possible, including the tool itself and the wheel fragments. The product liability lawyers at at Finch McCranie, LLP will be happy to consult with you about the case.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have handled many products liability cases involving dangerous drugs and consumer products. Last week the FDA announced the recall of Hydroxycut. Government officials warned dieter and body builders to immediately stop using Hydroxycut, a supplement which has been linked to serious liver damage and at least one death. According to an FDA official, the agency has received 23 reports of liver problems, including the death of a nineteen year old. It has been reported that other patients experienced symptoms ranging from jaundice, or yellowing of the skin, to liver failure.

If you are someone you know is currently using this product please consult with your physician immediately. If you have used this product and have been diagnosed with having liver damage call the product liability lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Consumer Protection , Dangerous Drugs , Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Liability , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Bus accidents (or motorcoach accidents) can multiply the loss of life and life-changing injuries. Our Bluffton University baseball team client will never be the same as a result of the bus accident in 2007 that left him permanently injured, and several of his teammates dead.

A bus accident in Utah in January 2008 that left nine dead likewise shows how bus safety has been a neglected issue. Today, the U.S. Department of Transportation finally took the step of ordering a "full review" of bus safety. The government's announcement is below:

U.S. DOT Orders Full Review of Motorcoach Safety

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today ordered a full departmental review of motorcoach safety. A Departmental Motorcoach Safety Action Plan will be created from the review’s findings. The plan will outline the additional steps needed to improve motorcoach safety for the millions of Americans who rely on these vehicles for safe transportation.
“Motorcoaches have been a safe form of transportation in the United States for many years, but even a single crash or accident is unacceptable” said Secretary LaHood. “We will continue our efforts to make them as safe as possible. As Secretary of Transportation, safety is my top priority.”

U.S. DOT agencies participating in the creation of the Action Plan include the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the Federal Highway Administration and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. The review will also consider outstanding recommendations to U.S. DOT from the National Transportation Safety Board.

The full departmental review follows a recent NTSB hearing concerning the motorcoach crash in Utah in January 2008 that resulted in nine fatalities. The report is expected to be completed and released by August 2009.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Bus Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers have written before that with the growing popularity of ATV’s or All-Terrain Vehicles, serious injury and death cases are on the increase in Georgia, especially among children. Yesterday, we read about a 12-year-old Alto, Georgia girl who was killed last Friday night about 8:30 p.m. in an accident involving an all-terrain vehicle in Banks County. According to the Georgia State Patrol the girl was driving the vehicle when it overturned on private property. A 15-year-old passenger, who was not identified, was injured and taken to Northeast Georgia Medical Center. Unfortunately Georgia is one of only five states with no ATV safety legislation. Between 1982 and 2003 there were 177 fatalities involving ATV’s. Of the 177 deaths, one third were children under 16. In 2004, there were 12 fatalities involving ATV, 50% of which were children under 17.
Almost all ATV accidents involving fatalities or serious injuries occur while violating one or more of the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s “Rules of ATV Operation”. These rules are as follows:
A. Children under sixteen should not ride adult-sized ATV (90 + cc’s).
B. Take a hands-on safety course.
C. Always wear a helmet while on an ATV.
D. Never drive an ATV on paved roads.
E. Never drive while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
F. Never drive an ATV with a passenger, and never ride as a passenger.
Despite these common sense rules, we continue to see children operating ATV’s and worse yet, operating them with passengers. Every new ATV that has come from the factory in recent years has a decal that warns the driver not to ride passengers. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured on an ATV, call the ATV injury lawyers at Finch McCranie LLP at 1 (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have represented many victims of defective products which have caused serious injury and sometimes death. Recently, there was a recall on a device meant to save lives, a defibrillator. Each year 250,000 to 450,000 Americans suffer a sudden heart stoppage or cardiac arrest due to a rhythm disturbance or silent coronary artery disease, according to the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. About 95 percent of those people die. A defibrillator delivers a shock which is meant to restore a person’s regular heart rhythm. Zoll Medical Corp has issued an alert because some of its AED Plus external defibrillators, used in public settings such as airports, have defective batteries and software, leading to failures to deliver a shock and two patient deaths. On February 2009, Zoll began asking customers to download new software that will help detect a potential defective battery. In addition to airports, the potentially defective defibrillators may be located in health clubs and schools. If you know of one of these products manufactured by Zoll, you should advise the owner that the manufacturer is asking customers to download free software from its website which will diagnose whether the batteries need replacement.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Consumer Protection , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia Injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have represented thousands of victims involved in automobile accidents and trucking/tractor trailer accidents. Regretfully many have resulted in serious, life changing injuries and some have resulted in death. In some of these cases, the injuries could have been lessened had the victim been wearing a seatbelt.

For years, Georgia law has required occupants of passenger cars to wear seatbelts; however, pickup trucks have been exempt. Recently, a bid to require adults in pickup trucks to buckle their seat belts was narrowly defeated by a Georgia House panel, defying supporters of stronger safety standards that are in effect in most of the nation.

Georgia already requires minors to wear seat belts and adults to wear them except in pickup trucks. Indiana law was similar to Georgia law on this subject; however, in 2007 the legislature passed a law which now requires adults to buckle up in pickup trucks. New Hampshire has no seat belt requirements whatsoever for adults.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have represented many victims of traumatic brain injury resulting from serious automobile accidents, tractor trailer accidents, workers compensation accidents, ATV/All Terrain Vehicle accidents, motorcycle accidents and premises liability accidents. A traumatic brain injury (TBI) is caused by a blow or jolt to the head or a penetrating head injury that disrupts the normal function of the brain. Not all blows or jolts to the head result in a TBI. The severity of a TBI may range from “mild,” i.e., a brief change in mental status or consciousness to “severe,” i.e., an extended period of unconsciousness or amnesia after the injury.

What many people do not realize is that major depression is a complication seen in about one-third of patients within the first year of a TBI and when present, is associated with poor psychosocial functioning and persisting post-concussive symptoms. Major depression is associated with substantial psychosocial dysfunction and post-concussive symptomatology following traumatic brain injury. Medication has been and is still prescribed to treat this complication; however, in a recent large clinical sample of patients with symptoms of major depression, anti-depressant medication has been shown to lead to the remission of symptoms in a minority of patients.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Motorcycle Accidents , Premises Liability , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Workers Compensation , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As a Georgia injury lawyer, I have represented a lot of truck drivers over the years in workers compensation claims, usually involving back injuries. Many of these drivers were well into their sixties and many had significant health problems which probably put the public at risk of serious injury and death had they become involved in a tractor trailer accident. It was always surprising when these older truck drivers who were clearly in bad health were able to pass a DOT physical examination. Last summer the Associated Press released a report which talked about this growing problem. Tractor-trailer and bus drivers in the Unites States are driving our highways with commercial licenses even though they qualify for full federal disability payments. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has admitted that it has fallen short in implementing the 8 recommendations that U.S. Safety Regulators have proposed since 2001. One of these would set minimum standards for officials who determine whether truckers are medically safe to drive. Truckers who have violated the medical rules set out by the government are every where but 12 states have proven to be leaders in producing violations. Texas, Maryland, Georgia, Florida, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan, Alabama, New Jersey, Minnesota and Ohio were all states where drivers broke the rules most often. The AP article lists several appalling cases where truck drivers have caused fatalities as a result of their medical violations. In some cases, morbidly obese truck drivers had heart attacks while others admitted to occasional blacking out and forgetting things. If you or a loved one have been injured as a result of being involved in a tractor trailer truck accident, call the trucking accident injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Bus Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

One of the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP recently got a case involving a propane explosion which completely burned and destroyed the client’s home. The explosion could easily have resulted in the death or serious injury of the clients entire family, including their new baby. Fortunately the injuries were not life threatening; however, they lost everything they owned and have no insurance to replace the home.
Propane is a highly combustible hydro-carbon gas, similar to ethane and butane. Propane gas is compressed to a liquid form and placed into tanker trucks for transport to local usage tanks. Propane is most frequently used as fuel for gas grills and in home heating systems. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, nearly 7 million American homes use propane as their primary heating fuel. Propane sold as home heating fuel is termed liquified petroleum gas and is composed of several other fuels in addition to propane. Liquified petroleum gas (LPG) is commonly made up of propane, small amounts of propylene and butane. A foul sulfurous odorant termed Ethanethiol is added to odorless propane gas as a safety precaution in order to detect leaks easily in storage tanks. Many home explosions occur as a result of propane suppliers failing to follow proper procedure in filling tanks. For instance, if a delivery is made and the tank to be filled is empty or the gauge is reading empty, the delivery technician should not fill the tank until the system is pressure tested to make sure that there is no leak present. In the alternative, if the tank is filled with propane, the line to the house should be turned off and the owner notified that the system needs to be tested before turning the gas on again. If these procedures are not followed and there is a leak, a deadly explosion can occur, resulting in death, serious injury and substantial property damage.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Georgia injury lawyers know well the serious injuries and wrongful deaths people suffer as a result of motor vehicle accidents; however, perhaps the most catastrophic accident is one involving tractor trailers. Some of the reasons for trucking accidents being such horrible accidents are plain to see. The size and weight of the trucks and cargo have the capacity to do tremendous harm if they are driven recklessly, negligently or under dangerous conditions.

A couple of years ago we represented a young wrecker driver who was off on the grass on Interstate 75 in Georgia. He was there with the police trying to remove vehicle which had been involved in a prior collision. As he was loading one of the wrecked cars on his flatbed wrecker, he looked up to see a tractor trailer veering off the roadway and heading directly towards him. He ran up the embankment to try to avoid being hit and was run over by the truck. As a result he sustained vary serious injuries. As it turned out, the guy who was actually in control of the truck was just a guy who was accompanying the real truck driver. He did not have a commercial drivers license and was actually on disability because of a spinal cord injury that affected the use of his lower extremities!

Many truck accidents occur because the driver is without sufficient skills or training; driving faster than the speed limit or too fast for the conditions; driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol; driving without sufficient sleep/falsifying logbooks or failing to properly secure loads.

Tractor trailer accident victims often sustain very severe injuries and incur hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills, not to mention thousands in lost wages. In these cases, it important to retain legal counsel as soon as possible to investigate on your behalf and to retain competent accident reconstruction experts.

If you or a loved one has been injured in a accident or wreck involving a truck, call one of the experienced truck accident lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As Georgia injury lawyers, we often get calls about pharmacy mistakes and prescription errors being committed by medical providers, including drug stores. Many times, the mistakes are caught before any damage is done; however, sometimes serious injury or death occurs. Recently, we read about a case where a pharmacist at a Wal-Mart store allegedly mislabeled a pill bottle, resulting in a woman in her 70's taking twice the recommended and prescribed dose of a blood pressure medication. As a result, she has suffered serious injury and almost died. Apparently the woman’s physician quickly discovered the pharmacy error but not before she suffered permanent heart damage and incurred substantial medical expenses.

In 2006, it was estimated that more than 1.5 million Americans were injured every year by drug errors in hospitals, nursing homes and doctor’s offices. Even as far back as 1999, it was estimated that at least 7,000 people die annually from drug errors. There are many reasons for the errors that occur. Most prescriptions are hand written and in some cases are difficult to read. In addition, many times there are bad interactions between different drugs a patient may be taking. Technology alone has the potential to eliminate some of these errors but industry and government has been slow to implement a comprehensive plan, including E-prescribing. For now, consumers must be aggressive in questioning doctors, nurses and pharmacists about their medications whether they are looking out for a friend or loved one in a nursing home or hospital or handling their own prescription medication at home.

If you or a loved one have been seriously injured as a result of drug store errors or prescription mis-labeling, contact an experienced Georgia injury lawyer at Finch McCranie, LLP.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Dangerous Drugs , Elder Abuse And Nursing Home Negligence , Medical Malpractice , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As a Georgia injury lawyer I read more and more about ATV accidents involving serious injuries and deaths, especially among children. Although there have been dozens of tragic deaths, I recall that in 2003 five Georgia children died after a car struck their ATV. The children, ranging in age from 11 to 14, had piled into the ATV and were going for a ride on a winding road during a birthday party when the collision occurred.

Two years ago, we represented the estate of a young girl who riding (as a passenger) on the back of an ATV being driven by another young girl at night. Our client was thrown from the ATV which resulted in her sustaining internal injuries which lead to her death.

Parents who purchase ATV’s and make them available to children may be exposing themselves to substantial personal liability when they fail to supervise the use of them. Many of the tragic cases I read about involve children riding other children on the back of the ATV. Other than with a few models manufactures most ATV’s clearly have labels which say that they are not to be used to ride passengers. Yet parents continue to allow their underage children to ride quests around on the back of the ATV. If it is not bad enough that they are allowed to ride passengers, many do so at night on public roads!

In Georgia, a parent can be held liable if they negligently entrust an ATV to a child who injures or kills someone with it. They can be held liable to a third party for failing to properly supervise a child operating an ATV and can certainly be held liable for knowingly allowing a child to operate an ATV in a negligent or dangerous manner. If the parents provide the ATV for the use and enjoyment of the family, they can be held responsible to third parties for injuries or death caused by its use or misuse.

If you or a loved one have been seriously injured as a result of the negligent operation of an ATV, call the Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As Georgia injury lawyers we have seen automobile accident and tractor trailer or trucking accidents that occur for a multitude of reasons. Lately however, we have seen a number of serious accidents that have occurred on Georgia highways or roads that are under construction. Just last week I read about a truck driver that lost control of his tractor trailer rig on Interstate 85 south of Atlanta. It veered over onto the shoulder, came back onto the roadway, overturned and skidded at least 100 feet down the interstate according to witnesses. This accident was the last in a series of three (3) accidents where large trucks have overturned on I-85 between Atlanta and Newnan where road construction has been underway for over two (2) years. One of many possible reasons for these accidents may be the accumulation of water on the roadway. When this occurs, drivers often lose control of their vehicles and the vehicles hydroplane. Generally there are three things that cause or contribute to a hydroplaning accident. One is water on the roadway, another is the speed of the vehicle and another is the condition of the tires. Any time there is an accident involving the wrongful death or serious injury of someone who has been involved in a collision on a wet highway, it is crucial that the families of the victims seek competent legal counsel immediately. This is so because experts can be dispatched to the scene to evaluate, document and preserve evidence before any of it changes or is destroyed. This is particularly true when the accident occurs on a roadway which is under construction. Many times the reason for water accumulation on the roadway may be that the road’s drainage systems may be inadequate or even blocked by construction debris. A timely on-scene investigation by good experts will usually pay off. Possible negligent parties may include road contractors, local governments, state governments and anyone else who may be responsible for maintenance of the roads.

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have been handling serious injury and wrongful death cases for over 40 years. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured as a result of the negligence of someone else, call us for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Bus Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

With the growing popularity of ATV’s or All-Terrain Vehicles, serious injury and death cases are on the increase in Georgia, especially among children. Believe it or not, the only legal requirements governing ATV operation in Georgia are that they have brakes and a muffler, and that the operators do not ride on private property without permission. Because of the ever increasing number of fatalities and serious injuries to ATV operators, especially children, the Georgia legislature decided it was necessary to study this problem to determine whether additional safety requirements should be added to the current law. To this end, the House ATV Safety Study Committee was created. The committee organized three public forums in three regions of the state for the purpose of hearing testimony from local law enforcement, medical professionals, ATV enthusiasts, industry representatives and concerned citizens about the issues surrounding safe ATV operation. In December 2005, the committee issued their report. One of the findings of the committee was that almost all ATV fatalities or serious injuries occur while violating one or more of the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s “Rules of ATV Operation”. Those rules are as follows:

1. Children under sixteen (16) should not ride adult-sized ATV (engines bigger than 90 cc’s).
2. Take a hands-on safety course.
3. Always wear a helmet while on an ATV.
4. Never drive an ATV on paved roads.
5. Never drive while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
6. Never drive an ATV with a passenger, and never ride as a passenger.

Notwithstanding all of the “work” that went into studying the problem, as of 2009 Georgia has yet to enact any legislation governing ATV operation in Georgia. Adults and parents of children must act responsibly to insure that ATV’s are not made available to young children and that they are operated safely. Some models of ATV’s have been found to have design defects and to have been manufactured with defective parts rendering them dangerous even if operated properly.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured on an ATV, call the Georgia injury lawyers and product liability lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As Georgia injury lawyers we see many wrongful death cases from motorcycle accidents. Most motorcycle accidents seem to involve young drivers; however, that is not always the case. In the last two weeks, a Georgia man was killed in a single-vehicle motorcycle accident when the driver, age 57, lost control of his 2009 Revtech EX Wide motorcycle in a curve and laid the bike down on its left side. According to the Georgia State Patrol’s investigation, the motorcycle left a 113 foot-long gouge in the pavement before leaving the roadway on the right shoulder. It then overturned for 51 feet before coming to rest. The rider was ejected from the motorcycle, thrown 61 feet and was pronounced dead a local hospital.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Motorcycle Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The Georgia injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have handled many products liability cases involving many different defective and dangerous products, including a defective and dangerous deer stand. When these products fail, catastrophic injury or death often results. This week I read about a recent case in which a jury returned a $157M (million) dollar verdict in a wrongful death case against three companies, L & L Enterprises in Hattiesburg, Miss., Ol’ Man Tree Stands in Jay, Florida, and TSR Inc. in Pace, Florida, who were involved in the manufacture and sales of a deer stand.

If you or a loved one have been seriously injured as a result of a defective product, the trial lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP stand ready to represent your interest and seek justice for you. Call us at (800) 228-9159 for a free consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Every year the Georgia injury attorneys at Finch McCranie, LLP get calls about people being seriously injured on All Terrain Vehicles (ATVs), especially children. Just last year we had a wrongful death case involving a minor and an ATV. In that case, we represented the family of a young girl who was thrown off of the back of an ATV while riding as a passenger, at night and with no helmet! As spring approaches, a quick warning about the dangers of ATVs is in order. When used appropriately and with proper safety precautions, ATVs can be an enjoyable form of recreation. However, when used inappropriately, these vehicles pose a great risk for catastrophic injury, including TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury). Consumer critics argue more limitations must be placed on ATV use. Backing then are some staggering numbers. For instance, children under the age of 16 account for two-thirds (2/3) of ATV-related deaths and injuries. Some states have passed regulations prohibiting young children from riding and requiring riders to wear helmets. One state (North Carolina) now requires safety training for all ATV riders. Unfortunately Georgia has no age restrictions and no helmet law. Regardless of what the lawmakers say, parents must insure their children are safely using ATVs, in order to avoid serious injuries or death. In our recent case, neither the driver of the ATV or the passenger were being properly supervised by adults. As a result of negligent supervision, she died. If you or a loved one have been injured on an ATV either as a result of a product defect of the ATV or because of the negligence of someone operating one, call the experienced lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP at (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: ATV All Terrain Vehicle Accidents , Brain Injury , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The more one reads about the problems with the products distributed by the Peanut Corporation of America, the more one realizes that there were serious management problems with that Company’s plant in Blakely, Georgia. According to published reports, when federal and state inspectors went to the plant, they found evidence of mold, leaking roofs and other unsanitary conditions. According to an FDA report, not only was there mildew on the ceiling roof of the storage room, there was also evidence of infestation by cockroaches and rodents. Subsequently, it was determined that the Company through its internal testing had, in fact, detected the presence of Salmonella in several of its product lines. These contaminated products were, nonetheless, shipped out into interstate commerce. On January 30 of this year, the Department of Justice launched a criminal investigation to get more answers about the Salmonella outbreak. Even thought the Peanut Corporation of America has now recalled all of the possible contaminated products associated with its Blakely facility, there have already been more than 8 deaths and 600 illnesses reported in 43 states arising from this scandal.

On January 27, 2009, the FDA completed its inspection of the Blakely, Georgia plant. The FDA reported that the records from the Georgia facility showed that there were 12 incidents in 2007 and 2008 where the Company had identified some type of Salmonella during its own testing procedures and yet still allowed its peanut products to be shipped out for sale. Given the FDA’s own inspection which documented numerous unsanitary conditions, and because of these internal test results, it is clear that there was a major problem with management at this facility. Obviously, this is why the government has launched a criminal investigation. Obviously, there has been an apparent lack of concern for public safety given the manner and method in which this operation was conducted.

According to the media, when the FDA initially inspected the Blakely, Georgia plant, plant officials were asked if there had been any reports of Salmonella at the facility. Repeatedly the government was told there had been none. This is extremely troubling which might be a partial basis of the criminal investigation. (It is a federal crime to make false statements to federal investigators and from media reports it appears that such a crime may have occurred.) Of course, all the facts are not in yet and no indictment has yet been returned against anyone. Nonetheless, the public reports concerning the Peanut Corporation of America’s Blakely, Georgia facility are troubling to say the least.

As of February of this year, over 1,500 peanut products have now been recalled because of the nationwide Salmonella outbreak associated with this facility. Until further testing is done by the Centers for Disease Control, it is not yet clear just how many of these 1,500 products were contaminated. What is clear is that there was a major problem with Quality Assurance at this facility which apparently has lead to many deaths and hundreds of illnesses across the country. Thus, not only is a criminal investigation fully warranted by these facts, it is likely that there will be considerable litigation against the Peanut Corporation of America by the innocent victims of these unsafe products.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

An outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease has been confirmed at Atlanta, Georgia’s Grady Memorial Hospital. Water tests confirmed today that two units at Grady Memorial Hospital were the source of the bacteria that caused Legionnaires. Four patients have been sickened by the disease.

A Grady spokesman claimed this was the first time in Grady’s history that the Downtown Atlanta hospital has been the source for disease in patients. The two Grady patient units consisting of and 80 beds have been closed since last week. The Grady spokesman said crews are treating these units and additional floors and will continue testing throughout the hospital.

Three of the four patients have responded to antibiotics and have been discharged. The fourth is still receiving treatment. An additional 50 patients have been tested for the disease, but those tests were negative.

Legionnaires disease is named for an outbreak at a 1976 convention of the American Legion in Philadelphia. It is not spread from one person to another. People get the disease when they breathe in a mist or vapor that’s contaminated with the naturally occurring bacteria.

A type of pneumonia, Legionnaires’ disease can cause death in up to 5 percent to 30 percent of cases.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Premises Liability , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Every spring and summer as swimming pools open for the season, we read about tragic drownings, often involving children. Statistics show that drowning and near drowning are a leading cause of death and brain injury. Many of these unfortunate incidents could be prevented if swimming pools had proper anti-drowning drain covers and suction cutoff devices installed. These covers and suction cutoff devices are designed to prevent children from being caught in the swimming pool drain as a result of strong suction. Under the new federal regulation, which went into effect last year, public swimming pools and hot tubs are required to install special devices that will prevent drain suction from trapping children under water. These new rules apply to pools and spas used by the public, including municipal pools and those at hotels, private clubs, apartment buildings and community centers. The new law does not require retro-fitting of private home pools.
As with any case, it is always important to throughly investigate the facts of a tragedy in a timely manner so as to preserve evidence. The law firm of Finch McCranie, LLP has represented the families of victims of serious injury and wrongful death accidents for over 40 years.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Premises Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Since our Atlanta, Georgia personal injury lawyers represent the most seriously injured survivor of the Bluffton University bus accident in March 2007, we have written previously why it is an outrage that seat belts are not required on buses in the United States.

Many of the serious injuries and deaths in the Bluffton rollover crash occurred because the bus had no seat belts--and thus passengers were ejected onto the roadway.

Tonight we were saddened to learn that this preventable tragedy has been repeated--once again. A bus travelling near Hoover Dam in Arizona rolled over, passengers apparently ejected onto the roadway, and seven passengers died.

News reports indicate that the bus was heading north on Highway 93 (a four-lane highway), veered right, and then overcorrected. The bus then apparently crossed the median and rolled over at least once.

The victims were Chinese citizens who had traveled from San Francisco to Las Vegas. When the crash occurred, they were returning from a trip to the Grand Canyon.

It is a "no brainer" that seat belts save lives. Most Americans are amazed that buses and motorcoaches are not required to have seat belts for passengers to use. When a bus wrecks, passengers can often be thrown around inside the bus and even ejected, and death or serious personal injury is a near certainty.

We hope the new administration in Washington puts a stop to this recurring tragedy by mandating that buses have seat belts. Ohterwise, the senseless deaths and horrific injuries will continue.

Continue reading "Bus Accident Near Hoover Dam Kills Seven--And Follows Atlanta, Georgia Bluffton University Crash As Another Example of Why Seat Belts on Motorcoaches Can Prevent Deaths and Serious Personal Injuries" »

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Bus Accidents , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Georgia injury attorneys are aware that in all cases where you are seeking money damages against a municipality on account of injuries to a person you must send them an ante litem notice within six months of the event. Many of theses cases or claims arise from automobile accidents, trucking accidents, police chases and other tort cases. Georgia law actually prohibits bring any action against a municipality without first giving them such notice as provided by the statute, O.C.G.A.§36-33-5.

Georgia Representative Edward Lindsay has introduced a new Bill (House Bill 125) which, if passed will amend the current statute with respect to claims involving damage to real property. Specifically, the amended bill extends the time period for sending the ante litem notice to municipalities from 6 months to 12 months for claims for damage to real property. It also provides: “In the case of a claim involving damage to real property, where the adjustment by the governing authority fails to result in a settlement and the claimant recovers a judgment in excess of any amount offered in settlement, a penalty in the amount of 25 percent of the recovery shall be added to the judgment”.

If you or a loved one has been injured as a result of the negligence of someone employed by a municipal corporation, you should contact one of the injury lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP who will insure that your rights are preserved.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Police Chases , Torts , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our Georgia injury lawyers know that food poisoning cases can result in serious injury, and sometimes death. Just this week, federal officials announced that two Georgia citizens have been poisoned by salmonella found in peanut products and they warned consumers of dangers associated with more than 125 products recalled as part of a nationwide salmonella-and-peanuts Investigation. The Food and Drug Administration said products affected by the recall range from ice cream to pet foods. A list of recalled peanut products is available on the FDA website. The FDA’s investigation has revealed the common denominator among the cases is that all the products contained peanut paste or peanut butter made at a plant in Blakely, Georgia. At least 486 people in more than 40 states have gotten sick since the outbreak began in the fall. Six people have died.

If you or a loved one have been poisoned as a result of adulterated food products, call the product liability attorneys at Finch McCranie, LLP for a consultation.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The injury lawyers in our firm have seen over the years that bicycle-car accidents can have serious consequences for the cyclist and often involve death or, at a minimum serious personal injury. A recent verdict demonstrates the kind of traumatic injuries that can occur in a bicycle-car collision. In that case, a jury returned a $1.8 million verdict in a personal injury case brought by a college student. She was seriously injured in 2005 when she was struck by 2 vehicles at an intersection near her campus. The injuries she sustained led to her having several surgeries and the partial amputation of her left leg.

The Finch McCranie, LLC firm in Atlanta, Georgia believes cyclists have the right to hold negligent drivers responsible for the harm they cause. If you have been hurt in a bike-car collision, you should contact a Georgia bike accident injury attorney at Finch McCranie, LLP. We have helped Georgia accident victims with the compensation they deserve since 1965, and we are committed to providing personalized service. For a free consultation, call us at 1-800-228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Brain Injury , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As Georgia personal injury lawyers we have represented many people who have died or sustained serious injuries as a result of falling. Many of them are senior citizens and many of the accidents are a result of dangerous conditions caused by the negligence of stores, restaurants and other businesses. Although the elderly most fear breaking a hip when they fall, a government study indicates that hitting their head can also have deadly consequences. Brain injuries account for half of all deaths from falls.
The study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the first comprehensive national look at the role brain injuries play in fatal elderly falls. It examined 16,000 deaths in 2005 that listed unintentional falls as an underlying cause of death. The study found that slightly more than half of the deaths were attributed to brain injuries. The other deaths were due to a variety of causes including heart failure, strokes, infections and existing chronic conditions worsened by a broken hip or other injuries sustained in a fall.

The attorneys at Finch McCranie, LLP have been standing up for the rights of injured victims for over 40 years. If you or a loved one has fallen and been injured as a result of the negligence of a store or other business, call us at (800) 228-9159.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Elder Abuse And Nursing Home Negligence , Premises Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our U.S. law firm celebrates Canada's Thanksgiving Day in October for a reason. When some Canadian citizens suffered tragic injuries and deaths in a tractor-trailer accident in Georgia some years ago, a Canadian lawyer contacted me to represent his parents, who had lost a son in this horrific truck wreck.

That role of helping Canadian families with their legal needs grew, as another Canadian family (through their Canadian lawyer) contacted me for the same reason.

I spent a Canadian Thanksgiving visiting the surviving parents, siblings, nieces, nephews, and in-laws of one of the most delightful human beings whom I never had the pleasure of meeting, but whom I came to know through representing his family through this tragedy. Their "real" Thanksgiving was delayed until we successfully resolved their case.

Later, in visiting the homes of other Canadian clients, I developed more of these bittersweet relationships with very fine people who live north of our U.S. border. We are now lifelong friends.

Recently, in visiting with our Canadian consul and his wife in Atlanta (terrific people who are neighbors of ours), I recounted some of the stories of these wonderful families. He requested our firm's contact information and said he was glad to know that our law firm is available to help Canadian families dealing with personal injuries or deaths in the U.S.

We have a great appreciation for our clients from Canada, and look forward to helping other Canadian families.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Aviation Accidents , Brain Injury , Premises Liability , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Last week we told the story of a recurring tragedy--a preventable aviation accident that took the lives of all on board--in a wrongful death lawsuit we filed last week.

The story of this airplane crash is yet another disturbing example of how lives are lost when basic safety--and common sense--are disregarded.

The pilot ignored clear warnings of dangerous weather, and proceeded into conditions that he and his aircraft were not capable of handling. Experienced pilots have a term--"get-there-itis"--for foolishly disregarding dangers and plowing ahead.

The aircraft crash was unforgiving, and all on board died. As aviation crash experts weigh in on all of the preventable errors made by this pilot, the family members wonder why this preventable accident had to occur.

The fact is that this preventable plane crash did not have to occur. We know that public safety depends on learning from past tragedies like this one, so that future ones can be prevented. We are committed to that result here.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Aviation Accidents , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

The tragedy of preventable construction accidents was repeated last week at the Atlanta Botanical Garden, a beautiful area near my home enjoyed by young and old alike. News reports have described the horror of one dead, and eighteen injured, many of them critically.

In our experience from having handled contruction accidents--including a much larger structure's construction collapse during the building of Philips Arena that killed ironworkers erecting a section of precast concrete--the injured workers and their families are in a state of shock and confusion. They should have some medical care available through their workers' compensation carrier, but that will not be enough to make up for what sound like very significant injuries. Nor will those benefits be enough to compensate the losses of the deceased worker.

A careful analysis must follow to determine the identity of all of the parties who had any role in the project, as well as the scope of the work undertaken by each of them, and the legal responsibilities imposed by contract or by law.

The plans and specifications prepared by the design professionals (architects and engineers), and the contracts and various subcontracts on the project must be obtained and scrutinized. Not only the contractor and subcontractors, but also any inspectors and consultants involved will have their roles reviewed, to determine what went wrong.

While some parties will have immunity under the workers' compensation statute, others will not. Those who share responsibility presumably will have purchased insurance in planning for precisely this type of catastrophe, so that the losses can be reimbursed fairly. With so many claimants, however, careful review of the insurance coverage will be necessary in case there was insufficient liability insurance purchased to cover these tragic losses.

In the Philips Arena cases, the parties involved resolved the claims in the largest mediation ever held at Henning Mediation in Atlanta--48 people who spent many days, including with Judge Jerry Baxter, who was instrumental in helping get the cases resolved. The families were distressed by their losses, but felt that the legal system had treated them fairly.

Unfortunately, in our experience the families may be beset by unscrupulous persons hoping to take advantage of their shock--and some may be attorneys without the type of experience needed to represent these victims fully and fairly. We hope that the families of those injured consult with family and friends to find experienced attorneys who have had success in this area, and who will leave no stone unturned in representing their clients.

Footnote: According to news reports, architecture firm Jova/Daniels/Busby made this statement this morning:

"During the construction process, there are temporary components built and used to help erect and support the creation of a permanent structure such as the walkway being built at the Atlanta Botanical Garden. While the investigation underway will help us all understand what actually occurred, it is important for people to know that the permanent structure as designed by the architect and the engineers was not fully in place at the time of the accident.

"The temporary components that are under investigation were designed by a separate professional engineer working for the structural steel erectors. The temporary shoring would have been removed after the permanent structure was complete."

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

A construction collapse involving a bridge was reported this morning at the Atlanta Botanical Gardens. Unfortunately, there appears to be one death and many serious injuries. Our lawyers have investigated and filed lawsuits in numerous construction collapse cases. The most notable was the collapse during the building of Phillips Arena in Atlanta.

While the reports do not indicate the cause of the collapse, there will undoubtedly be an investigation by OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Many times attorneys mistakingly believe that any recovery in these cases is barred by the workers compensation statute. In essence this statute prohibits an employee for suing an employer or co-employee for negligence.

However, there are many potential avenues by which a recovery for these types of fatalities and serious injuries can be obtained. There is potential liability against the designers and architects for improper or dangerous design. There may also be liability for the negligent installation or work of others who are not deemed co-employees. We have also successfully established liabilty for the furnishing or selling of defective components such as poorly mixed concrete.

Construction injuries resulting from collapses or failure of equipment should always be explored and investigated thoroughly. The failure to do so can result in a deserving client or survivor settling for small workers compensation benefits when a much larger recovery was probable.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Brain Injury , Construction Accidents , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

A Delaware truck driver met his death after crashing his tractor-trailer into some trees alongside Interstate 95 about 11 miles inside the Georgia state line. According to authorities 54-year-old Robert Earl Webb may have fallen asleep, but he also had a history of heart disease and there was evidence he may have suffered a heart attack just before Thursday’s crash. Authorities said Webb was alive just after the accident but died at the scene. The tractor trailer truck left the road and traveled 559 feet as it went down a banked roadbed and hit several trees before stopping upright in a water-filled ditch.

Cases like this one raise a lot of questions about tractor-trailer safety. Fortunately no one else was injured or killed as a result of this truck accident. Had it been otherwise, a competent lawyer representing the innocent victim would have been investigating to determine whether the driver was suffering from drivers fatigue or whether he was in adequate physical condition to have been driving a big rig.

Under federal law a tractor trailer driver can only drive a certain number of hours in a certain time period and must maintain an accurate record in the form of a driver’s logbook. In short there are many regulations governing the operation of a truck used in interstate commerce. If you or a family member has been injured in a tractor trailer truck accident you should contact the trial lawyers of Finch McCranie, LLP immediately to protect your legal rights.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our attorneys sometimes represent people who have been injured by employees of the State of Georgia in automobile accidents or truck accidents. Cases against the State of Georgia or its employees are governed by the Georgia Tort Claims Act. For instance we recently learned that a state accident reconstruction unit is investigating a wreck, involving a Georgia State Patrol trooper, that killed a motorcyclist in Lumpkin County last month. According to the motor vehicle accident report the state trooper executed a U-turn in the path of a Harley-Davidson motorcycle driven by 57 year-old Donald Teague of Blairsville. Teague’s motorcycle struck the patrol car when it turned around in the road, according to the report and he died after he collided with the passenger-side door of the patrol car. Depending on the facts, the State of Georgia may be liable for the wrongful death of Teague.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Motorcycle Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As serious injury lawyers we are increasing getting calls from victims of motor vehicle accidents caused by debris on Georgia’s highways and even Interstate highways. It is bad enough to come up on road debris in an automobile but it can easily result in the wrongful death of someone on a motorcycle. In Atlanta, it is not uncommon to see old furniture, ladders and other objects which have fallen off of vehicles.

This week, a Nepali student was killed in a motor vehicle accident in Fairfax County, Virginia. Kritika Singh, 21, who was driving an Isuzu Rodeo, died in the accident while avoiding a mattress laying on the roadway on I-66 highway. According to Virginia State Police, a box truck, which was in front of her vehicle, turned sharply to avoid hitting the mattress. Singh’s vehicle traveling behind the truck, hit the mattress, ran off the road and hit the truck.

A Georgia resident was killed when he tried to avoid a pickup truck bed liner which had blown out of the bed of the truck onto the highway. In that case authorities were able to trace the bed liner to the owner of the truck and criminal charges were lodged against the owners.

It is often difficult to identify the person or entity who was responsible for littering highways with road debris; however, we have on occasion been successful in doing so. If you have been injured as a result of similar accidents, it is imperative to contact a lawyer at Finch McCranie, LLP immediately so that a good and timely investigation can be done.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Motorcycle Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our Georgia attorneys often represent the drivers of motor vehicles who have been injured in collsions but sometimes the passengers are injured as a result of the negligence of the host driver. Just this week, we read that a Georgia man was arrested and charged in a September motorcycle crash that left a Panama City Beach woman dead. According to authorities, Storm P. Wood and a female passenger, Robin Arnett, were ejected from the motorcycle when Wood lost control of it. Arnett died from her injuries and Wood was taken to the hospital in critical condition. According to the authorities, tests determined that he had a blood-alcohol level of 0.187. The legal limit was 0.08. Wood has been taken into custody by Georgia authorities where he faces charges of felony DUI, manslaughter and felony driving with a suspended/revoked license.

Depending on the circumstances of the case, a guest passenger on a motorcycle or in a motor vehicle has a right to sue the operator of such a motor vehicle if they are injured as a result of the operator’s negligence. Under Georgia law, generally, a guest passenger who has no right of control and who does not assume control of the operation of the vehicle cannot have the negligence of the operator imputed to him or her.

If you have been injured while a guest passenger in a automobile or on a motorcycle being operated recklessly or negligently, you may very well have a cause of action against the operator of the vehicle who caused the accident and your injuries. Our trial lawyers at Finch McCranie, LLP have represented passengers who have been injured or the families of people who have been killed as a result automobile accidents caused by the operator of a motor vehicle who is doing so recklessly or negligently. The person who has been injured while a guest passenger would be well advised to consult the law firm of Finch McCranie, LLP before giving any statements to insurance adjusters or discussing the case with anyone.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Motorcycle Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As Georgia lawyers handling automobile accident and truck accident cases we have litigated many such cases against Georgia municipalities. I recently read about a case where a man and his wife in Columbus, Georgia filed a personal injury lawsuit against the City of Columbus and a former firefighter to recover for injuries sustained after he ran into their vehicle with a city fire truck. The former firefighter who reportedly tested positive for cocaine an hour and 15 minutes after the crash resigned his job shortly after the collision

What is interesting about the case is that under current Georgia law, city and county governments have sovereign immunity which is waived only to the extent of available liability insurance they may have in force. In this case, the City had $100,000.00 in liability coverage and therefore that was the extent to which the plaintiffs could normally recover from them even if a jury had awarded them substantially more. Fortunately for these injured victims the City of Columbus apparently saw fit to pay them an amount over and above the $100,000.00 in liability insurance and settled the case with them for $175,000, but it could have been different.

Georgia’s sovereign immunity law is unfair to victims of automobile and truck accidents which are caused by the negligence of government employees in the performance of their jobs. People should call their state legislators and ask that cities and counties be held accountable like a private person. It is outrageous to think that a person can be injured or killed by a negligent city or county employee and that the victim would be limited in their recovery to whatever insurance may have been purchased by the governmental entity. The state and the counties should be liable for injuries or death just like any other private citizen.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Truck and Tractor Trailer Accidents , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Our firm has handled several tragic wrongful death cases involving children who have died in fires caused by defective products such as a space heater or air purifier. Each year, approximately 500 children under age 14 are killed in house fires. Such fires are estimated to have injured many thousands more. What we have seen here in our practice is mirrored by the national experience. Indeed, the most common causes of burn injuries among children emanate from hair curlers, space heaters, ovens, ranges, gasoline, fireworks and other potentially dangerous products. Oftentimes these tragic cases are caused by misuse of the product or allowing a product to be accessed by a child who inadvertently uses it in an improper manner. In other cases, however, as discussed, innocent children can die because of defective products in the home. As an example, if there is an electrical circuit short in a space heater and a fire erupts in a mobile home and a child is asleep at the time, obviously, this can be a deadly combination which can result in terrible tragedy. Regrettably, we have handled cases exactly like this so we are familiar with just how tragic and difficult these cases can be for families who have to suffer through them.

Notwithstanding the availability of smoke alarms in today’s marketplace, regrettably, it is estimated that approximately 25% of homes in America today still do not have working smoke alarms. This can be the difference between life or death if a defective product is in the home. Therefore, we encourage all members of the public to make sure that they have a working smoke alarm in their home. Also, any product that has the potential for shortage that may run all night while family members are sleeping should be carefully maintained and all the instructions for the product should be followed so as to minimize the risk of serious injury or death emanating from a product capable of causing fire to the home.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

As Georgia injury lawyers who have handled many automobile and truck accident cases, we sometimes see defective products that lead to injury and death in collisions. One such defect involves airbags. Although airbag failures are not common, there are many reasons for there failure. Many fail because of design defects or defects in components.

Just last month, Nissan Motor Co Ltd announced plans to recall 204,361 vehicles from its 2007 and 2008 model years in the United States due to the possibility that a passenger side airbag could fail to deploy properly in an accident.

The voluntary recall covers 2007 and 2008 Nissan Altima, Altima Coupe, 350Z, Murano and Rogue; and Infinity G35 Sedan, G37 Coupe and EX35 built from March 12, 2007 to May 27, 2008, according to a notice the company provided to the U. S. Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Nissan said it began to investigate the issue in November 2007 after receiving several warranty reports of airbag warning lamps flashing. In late September, Nissan determined that a safety-related defect existed and it should conduct a recall.

In some vehicles the passenger side airbag could fail to receive a proper signal and a supplemental airbag warning light could flash and a status light would illuminate to warn the driver that it is not working properly.

If you or someone you know have sustained serious injuries as a result of having been in a collision where the airbag in your vehicle did not deploy, it is critical that the vehicle be protected and preserved so that it can be examined by an expert. Too many times the vehicle is left out in the weather and or sent to a salvage yard where critical evidence is lost forever.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Products Liability , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

According to news reports, Atlanta Police Officer Sgt. Darrell Johnson was killed on Friday morning, October 24 when his vehicle was struck head-on by a fleeing suspect during a high speed police chase. Not only was the police officer killed, the fleeing suspect was killed as well.

The newspaper reports are sketchy, however, it appears that the high speed chase began when authorities received a 911 call from a member of the public who had spotted the suspect’s car while weaving. The officers apparently attempted to make a traffic stop of the suspect. When the suspect refused to stop for the suspected traffic violation, he took off, thus initiating a “high speed” chase. During the chase, the suspect lost control, crossed the center line and hit Sgt. Johnson’s vehicle head-on.

According to the news accounts of this tragic incident, it appears that the fleeing suspect was a veteran of the Iraq war. He may have had personal issues based on his experience there. The police allege that he was driving while drunk, but there is no indication whether this is based on a blood alcohol test or just based on his driving at the time. Either way, it seems evident that a drunk driver who is not being pursued by the police is not nearly as dangerous as is the drunk driver who is attempting to elude officers while traveling at high speeds while impaired. At least one expert, Professor Geoffrey Alpert of the University of South Carolina, has been known to say that the one thing that is much worse than a drunk driver is a drunk driver being chased at high speeds by the police.

While it is difficult to evaluate this particular case based on the sketchy news reports, what is troubling about the account is that it appears that this high speed police chase was initiated for a traffic violation only. Clearly, the danger to the public presented by a high speed police chase can be greater than is the danger presented by a mere traffic violator. The police should not be chasing someone for a mere traffic offense when other innocent members of the motoring public are placed at risk of either serious injury or death. To impose the death penalty upon an innocent member of the motoring public in order to apprehend a traffic violator makes little or no sense. The police simply need to recognize that sometimes the suspect has to be allowed to escape so that the chase itself will not endanger the innocent motoring public.

Having seen many other innocent persons killed or injured during high speed police chases, we continue to advocate that the police should chase at high speeds only when the public itself is endangered by the suspect. Yes the police should chase murderers, rapists, carjackers and other armed violent felons, but to chase someone at high speeds for a traffic violation is to unnecessarily place the entire public at risk. When the death penalty is imposed upon the innocent for a minor traffic offense, we would submit that the public is neither served nor protected which, of course, is the paramount duty of all law enforcement officials.

Continue reading "High Speed Chase Ends In Two Deaths: Was It Worth It?" »

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Police Chases , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

In our serious injury practice, we are often encountered by cases where there is a dispute concerning liability for a particular collision. The tractor-trailer driver contends that he was forced off the road by an unknown John Doe motorist. The at fault driver who ran over the pedestrian claims that he or she could not see the pedestrian due to lighting conditions. The driver who is speeding denies that, in fact, he was speeding, and on and on. In cases involving serious or catastrophic injuries and/or death, it is often necessary in such cases to retain the services of a qualified accident reconstruction expert to establish exactly what happened. A qualified forensic engineer typically can reconstruct an accident based on measurements made at the scene by investigating police officers and/or based on the physical damage to the vehicles. A crush analysis can be performed on vehicles whereby a trained accident reconstruction expert can determine the speed of the vehicle which had to have occurred in order to create the objective crush damage to the vehicle. For example, if a vehicle’s front end is knocked in by a foot or so by another vehicle, the engineer can get the respective weights of the vehicles and can determine through calculations exactly how much force had to be applied to deform the vehicle to such an extent. This then can be translated into speed which can prove liability on behalf of the driver who caused the collision.

For those unfortunate victims of serious injury claims, particularly in those cases where there is a dispute concerning liability for a particular crash or collision, it is necessary that such a victim confer with counsel who is experienced dealing with accident reconstruction experts. Quite literally, a good accident reconstruction expert can either make or break a case where liability is contested. Our firm likes to use engineers from the Georgia Institute of Technology because they carry quite a bit of credibility with local juries. However, we have also worked with accident reconstruction experts throughout the country depending upon the type of vehicle collision involved. For example, there are some experts that specialize in under-ride situations where a car under-rides a tractor-trailer, there are other experts who specialize in engineering issues concerning the design of dangerous roads and bridges and there are other experts who have considerable expertise with respect to rollovers, seatbelts, brakes and the like. The point to be made, of course, is that in any serious or catastrophic claim, the victim needs to confer with counsel who is experienced in dealing with forensic engineers so that responsibility for a particular collision can be reconstructed by that engineer and liability established. Without proof of liability, of course, counsel’s ability to obtain compensation for the innocent victim of a serious collision is limited, thus because such proof is so important, an accident reconstruction expert should always be considered in any potentially serious injury case involving contested liability issues.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Torts , Trial Techniques , Wrongful Death

Bookmark:

Under Georgia law, the driver of an authorized emergency vehicle, including a law enforcement vehicle, when responding to an emergency call, has certain privileges that are not available to other drivers. As an example, the authorized emergency vehicle operator may proceed past a red or stop signal and exceed the maximum speed limits posted so long as he or she does not endanger life or property. The authorized emergency vehicle may also disregard regulations governing direction of movement or turning in specified directions. The exceptions for authorized emergency vehicles only apply, however, when the emergency vehicle is making use of an audible signal and use of flashing and revolving lights visible for a distance of 500 feet. Thus, fire trucks, ambulances and police officers are excepted from normal statutory provisions governing the movement of their vehicles provided they have their siren and lights operating at the time. However, even if lights and sirens are being used, the foregoing provisions “shall not relieve the driver of an authorized emergency vehicle from the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons.” See O.C.G.A. § 40-6-6(d)(1).

There is no inherent right of an emergency vehicle operator to disregard the law. If it is unsafe to do so and an ambulance driver or fire truck proceeds through an intersection without slowing down, this can be negligence which is actionable under Georgia law. While the facts of each case are obviously different, even authorized emergency vehicles must exercise “due regard” for the safety of the public. If they operate their emergency vehicles in a manner which is clearly dangerous, the governmental entity can be held liable under Georgia law. Nonetheless, sovereign immunity is always a problem in these cases. If the officer was truly responding to an emergency and was exercising due regard for the safety of the public, sovereign immunity will work to defend the government against civil claims arising from an unfortunate collision that occurs during the authorized use of an emergency vehicle.

We have seen many cases where innocent third parties were caught up in collisions with emergency vehicles. We have seen these with ambulance drivers, police vehicles and fire trucks. Eyewitness testimony concerning whether lights and sirens were being used and/or whether the operator of the vehicle was exercising due regard for the safety of the public is key to investigating these cases. Because every case is factually specific and because the doctrine of sovereign immunity is always an issue in these cases, any victim of such a collision should confer with counsel as soon as possible.

Posted by Finch McCranie, LLP | Permalink | Email This Post

Posted In: Automobile Accidents , Torts , Wrongful Death

Bookmark: